每日简报

利用高维工具变量筛选估计潜在双重网络并开展推断AI 解读

We develop a novel methodology for estimation and inference in high-dimensional panel network models with latent dual structures. The framework allows outcomes to be affected simultaneously by positive and negative interaction channels, accommodating settings in which some interactions reinforce outcomes while others generate competition and displacement effects. The proposed method identifies and estimates the network directly from the structural model using observed data…

干预分布公式的验证AI 解读

We formalize verification in causal graphical models: deciding whether a given observational formula identifies a target interventional distribution. This opens a problem complementary to identification, asking not whether any identifying formula exists, but whether the given formula is identifying. We show that even sound and complete solutions to identification do not solve verification. We propose a falsifier as a first practical route forward, prove that it induces an…

处理状态缺失时，如何学习应该干预谁AI 解读

Policy learning methods are increasingly used to inform treatment allocation under budget constraints. Most proposed methods assume complete treatment data, yet applications frequently suffer from missingness that can bias estimates and lead to suboptimal policies. We address this gap by extending efficient estimators for average treatment effect (ATE) estimation to policy value and conditional average treatment effect (CATE) estimation under missing at random (MAR) and…

单调处理响应下，处理效应超过给定阈值的概率AI 解读

Experiments may, by design, prevent one from observing on a single subject both the response to a treatment and to its absence. Because of this, marginal distributions for both cases may be observable but not their joint distribution, thus obscuring the distribution of the treatment effect. We examine the case where we impose that the treatment effect is nonnegative, also called monotone treatment response, a common assumption relevant to many practical applications. We…

多商品多期库存控制的实验设计AI 解读

Randomized experiments, or A/B testing, are the gold standard for evaluating interventions, yet they remain underutilized in inventory management. This study addresses this gap by analyzing A/B testing strategies in multi-item, multi-period inventory systems with lost sales and capacity constraints. We examine two canonical experimental designs--switchback experiments and item-level randomization--and show that both suffer from systematic bias due to interference: temporal…

部分可观测的结构因果模型AI 解读

Here we introduce Partially Observed Structural Causal Models (POSCMs) as an extension of structural causal models (SCMs) to settings where upstream contexts co-determine both the interaction structure and downstream mechanisms on observed variables. POSCMs thus provide a self-contained causal modeling framework for endogenous graphs, allowing for an intervention hierarchy spanning node- and edge-level contexts and endogenous variable interventions. To define edge…

用于因果推断的生成式合成数据：陷阱、补救与机会AI 解读

Synthetic tabular data are often evaluated by distributional similarity, privacy distance, or train-on-synthetic-test-on-real predictive performance, but these criteria do not ensure validity for causal inference. We show that fully generative tabular synthesizers, including GAN- and LLM-based models, can preserve predictive utility while distorting average treatment effect (ATE) estimates. The failure is structural: ATE preservation requires both a realistic covariate law…

利用处理后变量研究预测性处理效应异质性的经验分层AI 解读

Post-treatment variables (PVs), such as intercurrent events, treatment noncompliance, and behavioral responses to treatment, provide information about individuals' post-treatment responses and may help characterize heterogeneity in treatment effects on the primary outcome. This paper develops an empirical stratification framework to study the treatment effect heterogeneity across baseline-predicted PV response profiles. Specifically, we construct empirical scores from…

智能体经济建模AI 解读

We introduce Agentic Economic Modeling (AEM), a framework that aligns synthetic LLM choices with small-sample human evidence for econometric inference. AEM first generates task-conditioned synthetic choices via LLMs, then learns a bias-correction mapping from task features and raw LLM choices to human-aligned choices, upon which standard econometric estimators perform inference to recover demand elasticities and treatment effects. We validate AEM in two experiments. In a…