跳到正文
简报说明

来源与收录范围

汇总期刊目录中的 16 个期刊来源,以及 arXiv 计量经济学与相关统计、金融分类和主题检索中的预印本。期刊题录主要来自 Crossref,可靠摘要保留补充来源;期刊官网链接可在论文检索的说明中核对。

保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。待核验、范围外及撤回记录不进入公开简报。基础文献按学习与研究需要单独选编。

此前日简报及周、月简报按可核实的原站发表、首次提交和修订日期归档;历史补录只留在文献库。期刊仅纳入收录当月新发表或提前取得题录的论文;只有月份的记录仅进入对应月简报。arXiv 同期只计一次,首次发布优先;未保存的中间版本无法补算。撤回内容会同步移除;所有历史补录仍可在论文检索中查找。

当前结果:已发表 0 篇 · 待刊 0 篇 · 预印本 12 篇

关键词匹配标题、摘要、作者或 DOI;支持部分字母,多词同时匹配,双引号匹配短语。

本期动态按期刊、arXiv 首次发布、arXiv 修订分组,组内默认本文引用优先。也可选择作者引用优先或最新收录。

期刊论文在前,预印本在后。组内先看本文引用,再看已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,最后按当前日期顺序排序。

“作者引用”指已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,不合计共同作者。目前作者指标只来自有身份关联快照的预印本,普通期刊条目可能没有该项数据;本页 0/12 篇有可核验作者指标。

本文引用采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本;缺失不记作零。累计引用会随时间积累,可结合近年范围比较;引用数和作者发表经历是阅读线索,不代表论文质量或同行评审状态。

“作者发表记录”展示作者已有论文的可核验发表记录,不证明该预印本已接收或通过同行评审。

正常题录、可靠摘要和引用同步继续;AI 解读依据可靠材料,材料不足时保留待解读状态。

本期 12 篇
导出

arXiv · 本期首次发布

Semi-nonparametric estimation of spatial dynamic panel data models with nonparametric spatial weights

采用非参数空间权重的空间动态面板模型半非参数估计

We develop a semi-nonparametric framework for spatial dynamic panel data (SDPD) models with two-way fixed effects when the spatial interaction structure is unknown beyond a distance measure. This is accomplished by modelling spatial weights in the outcome, lagged-outcome, and disturbance channels as unknown functions of underlying economic distances. These enter the SDPD system through matrix-function operators, providing a unified approach that accommodates both spatial…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Group-Level Treatment Effect Heterogeneity in Difference-in-Differences: A Balanced Approach

双重差分中的组间处理效应异质性:一种平衡方法

Understanding how treatment effects vary across groups is central to policy evaluation. In Difference-in-Differences designs, heterogeneity is often studied using subgroup or triple-difference analyses, which can suffer from conservative inference, reliance on parametric interaction structures, and sensitivity to differences in covariate distributions across groups. We propose the Balanced Group Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (BGATT), a new estimand that isolates…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Heterogeneous Peer Effects with Endogenous Network Formation

内生网络形成下的异质同伴效应

This paper introduces a new econometric framework for modeling social interactions with heterogeneous peer responses, addressing endogenous link formation. Our Selection-corrected Heterogeneous Spatial Autoregressive (SCHSAR) approach jointly models link formation and outcome determination. We incorporate a finite mixture structure to capture heterogeneity in peer effects and account for unobserved individual-specific factors driving both network formation and outcome…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Infinitesimal Causality

无穷小因果性

Interventions can be varied continuously in many causal models. Differentiating a specified smooth intervention protocol produces vector fields on a statistical model, and their Lie brackets describe the noncommutativity of the corresponding local perturbations. We formulate this differential geometry of interventions on smooth statistical models and call the resulting framework infinitesimal causality (IC). Given a constant-rank distribution spanned by visible intervention…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

arXiv · 本期修订

Matrix-valued Network Autoregression Model with Latent Group Structure

具有潜在组结构的矩阵值网络自回归模型

Matrix-valued time series data are frequently observed in a broad range of areas and have attracted great attention recently. In this work, we model network effects for high dimensional matrix-valued time series data in a matrix autoregression framework. To characterize the potential heterogeneity of the subjects and handle the high dimensionality simultaneously, we assume that each subject has a latent group label, which enables us to cluster the subject into the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Model-Agnostic Bounds for Augmented Inverse Probability Weighted Estimators' Wald-Confidence Interval Coverage in Randomized Controlled Trials

随机对照试验中 AIPW 估计器 Wald 区间覆盖率的模型无关界

Nonparametric estimators, such as the augmented inverse probability weighted (AIPW) estimator, have become increasingly popular in causal inference. Numerous nonparametric estimators have been proposed, but they are all asymptotically normal with the same asymptotic variance under similar conditions, leaving little guidance for practitioners to choose an estimator. In this paper, I focus on another important perspective of their asymptotic behaviors beyond asymptotic…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Transporting causal effects from a randomized trial without "transportability:" a case study of political advertising during U.S. elections

放宽可迁移性假设的随机试验效应外推:美国选举政治广告案例

During the 2020 U.S. presidential election, Aggarwal et al. (2023) conducted a large-scale randomized experiment to evaluate a digital ad campaign against Trump in five battleground states. While the study found no effect on voter turnout, it's unclear whether this null result generalizes to other battleground states, notably Georgia, which played a unique role in the 2020 election and differs from the battleground states. Inspired by the study, we present a transfer…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Higher-Order Debiased Estimators for General Treatment Models

一般处理模型中的高阶去偏估计器

It is now well known that estimators based on influence functions can be sub-optimal in terms of convergence rates in various settings. To address this issue, higher-order influence functions (HOIF) are developed, generalizing the classical semiparametric theory. However, most existing results in this regard focus on treatment effect parameters defined in explicit forms, such as average treatment effects (ATE). In applications, economists are often confronted with tasks of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

When Do Treatment Changes Identify Causal Effects?

处理变化何时能够识别因果效应?

This paper clarifies the identifying assumptions underlying causal inference based on treatment changes rather than levels, and their relationship to conventional identification strategies. We characterize two structural models, with non-nested assumptions, under which treatment-change identification is valid conditional on observed covariates by differencing out time-constant confounders that are additive in the treatment equation. The assumptions underlying treatment…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Statistical Foundations of LLM-based A/B Testing: A Surrogacy Framework for Human Causal Inference

基于大语言模型的 A/B 测试:人类因果推断的替代终点框架

Organizations and researchers show increasing interest in using large language models (LLMs) in place of human participants in A/B tests, in the hope of experimenting faster and at lower cost. We study when a treatment effect estimated on LLM outcomes can recover the effect for the human population of interest. Distributional equivalence between LLM and human outcomes would make any standard estimator valid but is unrealistic. We therefore develop a statistical framework…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

When Do Traditional and Causal Decomposition Methods Diverge? A Practical Guide for Studying Health Disparities

传统分解与因果分解何时分歧?健康差异研究的实用指南

Identifying malleable factors that can reduce social disparities is a central objective among researchers across disciplines. Traditionally, researchers have relied on the difference-in-coefficients and Kitagawa-Oaxaca-Blinder frameworks. More recently, methods grounded in the potential outcomes framework have emerged. While these methods share the same goal of identifying drivers of disparity, they frequently yield divergent results depending on the underlying confounding…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Networked risk perception and behavioral bubbles: the case of a pandemic

网络化风险感知与行为泡沫:疫情案例

Risk perception is typically modeled as an individual cognitive readout of objective hazard, yet during crises what people judge as risky is shaped by what their peers do. Using weekly mobility data from 313 Massachusetts municipalities over the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic and a pre-pandemic inter-town mobility network that fixes interaction structure before the shock, we estimate two-way fixed-effects panel regressions that separate local case response, inter-town…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓