跳到正文
简报说明

来源与收录范围

汇总期刊目录中的 16 个期刊来源,以及 arXiv 计量经济学与相关统计、金融分类和主题检索中的预印本。期刊题录主要来自 Crossref,可靠摘要保留补充来源;期刊官网链接可在论文检索的说明中核对。

保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。待核验、范围外及撤回记录不进入公开简报。基础文献按学习与研究需要单独选编。

此前日简报及周、月简报按可核实的原站发表、首次提交和修订日期归档;历史补录只留在文献库。期刊仅纳入收录当月新发表或提前取得题录的论文;只有月份的记录仅进入对应月简报。arXiv 同期只计一次,首次发布优先;未保存的中间版本无法补算。撤回内容会同步移除;所有历史补录仍可在论文检索中查找。

当前结果:已发表 0 篇 · 待刊 0 篇 · 预印本 10 篇

关键词匹配标题、摘要、作者或 DOI;支持部分字母,多词同时匹配,双引号匹配短语。

本期动态按期刊、arXiv 首次发布、arXiv 修订分组,组内默认本文引用优先。也可选择作者引用优先或最新收录。

期刊论文在前,预印本在后。组内先看本文引用,再看已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,最后按当前日期顺序排序。

“作者引用”指已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,不合计共同作者。目前作者指标只来自有身份关联快照的预印本,普通期刊条目可能没有该项数据;本页 0/10 篇有可核验作者指标。

本文引用采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本;缺失不记作零。累计引用会随时间积累,可结合近年范围比较;引用数和作者发表经历是阅读线索,不代表论文质量或同行评审状态。

“作者发表记录”展示作者已有论文的可核验发表记录,不证明该预印本已接收或通过同行评审。

正常题录、可靠摘要和引用同步继续;AI 解读依据可靠材料,材料不足时保留待解读状态。

本期 10 篇
导出

arXiv · 本期首次发布

Hyperedge-Triggered Hawkes Processes for Diagnosing Higher-Order Temporal Dependence in Event Streams

用于诊断事件流高阶时间依赖的超边触发 Hawkes 过程

Monte Carlo simulation is used to assess a likelihood-based EM procedure for diagnosing higher-order temporal dependence in multivariate event streams. Multivariate Hawkes processes provide a likelihood-based framework for modelling self- and cross-excitation in continuous-time event streams, but their standard pairwise formulation can confound dense dyadic excitation with genuinely group-triggered temporal dependence. We introduce a hyperedge-triggered Hawkes model in which…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Confounder Detection via Treatment Intent: A New Observational Study Design

通过处理意向发现混杂因素:一种新的观察研究设计

Understanding the effects of interventions is central to scientific progress, with randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarded as the gold standard for causal inference in many applied fields. However, RCTs are costly, time-consuming, and often constrained by ethical or practical limitations, motivating the need for causal methods able to draw conclusions from observational data. While such data is collected at ever larger scale, making its use for causal inference is often…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Learning a directed acyclic graph with additive heteroscedastic errors

具有加性异方差误差的有向无环图学习

This paper studies causal discovery for a directed acyclic graph under a structural equation model with additive heteroscedastic errors. We first establish new identifiability results for location-scale noise models, showing that heteroscedasticity can be leveraged to recover causal directions. Based on these insights, we propose a novel iterative procedure, Residual Simultaneous Quantile Estimation (RESQUE), where each iteration consists of a residual-construction stage and…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Global Average Treatment Effects for Individualized Randomization Experiments with Aggregate Data

仅用聚合数据识别个体随机化实验的全局平均处理效应

Individualized randomized experiments are central to online platforms for optimizing personalized decisions in complex environments. In two-sided markets, however, standard treatment effect estimation is often invalid due to strong temporal and cross-unit interference, a challenge compounded when only aggregated data are available because of privacy or system constraints. To address these issues, we identify the Global Average Treatment Effect (GATE) using only group-level…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Auditing and Fixing Economic Validity in Tabular Foundation Models for Discrete Choice

审计并修复表格基础模型在离散选择中的经济有效性

Tabular foundation models achieve strong accuracy on choice prediction tasks, but their predictions often violate the economic logic those tasks require: raising a price sometimes increases predicted demand, and implied willingness-to-pay estimates are frequently negative or implausible. We propose a two-stage adapter that embeds foundation model predictions within a utility-maximization framework. In the first stage, we estimate a standard choice model whose parameters are…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Causally-interpretable meta-analysis using aggregate data

利用汇总数据开展具有因果解释的元分析

Evidence syntheses and meta-analyses are used to inform clinical practice guidelines and health economic evaluations. However, heterogeneity of treatment effects poses a significant challenge. Conventional meta-analysis addresses heterogeneity through random-effect assumptions, which are not supported by design and lead to estimates that may not apply to any real-world population. Causally-interpretable meta-analysis (CIMA) offers a rigorous framework for specification,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Function-Valued Causal Influence in Nonlinear Time Series

非线性时间序列中的函数值因果影响

Causal discovery in time series is increasingly performed using nonlinear machine-learning models, yet the resulting causal relationships are almost always summarized by scalar edge scores. We argue that this practice obscures the true object learned by nonlinear autoregressive models: a state-dependent function whose effect varies across regimes, magnitudes, and contexts. We formalize function-valued causal influence for additive, contribution-decomposable architectures and…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Semiparametric Inference for Causal Effects on Functional Outcomes

函数型结局因果效应的半参数推断

Difference-in-differences (DiD) is a cornerstone of causal inference, yet extending it to functional outcomes is not a routine scalar generalization; rather, it entails three fundamental challenges in identification, inference, and observation. This paper develops a comprehensive semiparametric inference framework for functional DiD with discretely observed data. First, we define the functional average treatment effect under parallel trends and derive its efficient influence…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

arXiv · 本期修订

Causal Machine Learning: A Survey and Open Problems

因果机器学习:综述与开放问题

Causal Machine Learning (CausalML) is an umbrella term for machine learning methods that formalize the data-generation process as a structural causal model (SCM). This perspective enables us to reason about the effects of changes to this process (interventions) and what would have happened in hindsight (counterfactuals). We categorize work in CausalML into five groups according to the problems they address: (1) causal supervised learning, (2) causal generative modeling, (3)…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A Simple Measure of Robustness for External Validity under Covariate Shifts

协变量分布偏移下外部有效性的简明稳健性度量

This paper studies the robustness of estimated policy effects to changes in the distribution of covariates, a key determinant of the external validity of (quasi)-experimental results. I propose a novel robustness metric $δ^*$ which measures the smallest covariate shift needed to invalidate an empirical claim about the policy effect (e.g., $ATE > 0$). I estimate $δ^*$ via de-biased GMM, achieving a parametric rate of convergence while accommodating machine-learning estimators…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓