每日简报

交互固定效应因子数未知时的线性面板回归AI 解读

In this paper we study the least squares (LS) estimator in a linear panel regression model with unknown number of factors appearing as interactive fixed effects. Assuming that the number of factors used in estimation is larger than the true number of factors in the data, we establish the limiting distribution of the LS estimator for the regression coefficients as the number of time periods and the number of cross-sectional units jointly go to infinity. The main result of the…

含交互固定效应的动态线性面板回归模型AI 解读

We analyze linear panel regression models with interactive fixed effects and predetermined regressors, for example lagged-dependent variables. The first-order asymptotic theory of the least squares (LS) estimator of the regression coefficients is worked out in the limit where both the cross-sectional dimension and the number of time periods become large. We find two sources of asymptotic bias of the LS estimator: bias due to correlation or heteroscedasticity of the…

含交互固定效应的随机系数 Logit 需求模型估计AI 解读

We extend the Berry, Levinsohn and Pakes (BLP, 1995) random coefficients discrete-choice demand model, which underlies much recent empirical work in IO. We add interactive fixed effects in the form of a factor structure on the unobserved product characteristics. The interactive fixed effects can be arbitrarily correlated with the observed product characteristics (including price), which accommodates endogeneity and, at the same time, captures strong persistence in market…

自我中心群组实验设计下的处理效应与溢出效应估计AI 解读

Network interference occurs when a unit's outcome depends not only on its own treatment but also on the treatments received by connected units in the network. Experimental designs and analysis methods that ignore such interference can yield biased estimators of causal effects. In this paper, we develop a new experimental design for the estimation and inference of global treatment effect and spillover effect under a model-based framework and ego-cluster randomization. Under…

度异质性双边网络形成模型的惩罚似然估计AI 解读

Estimating network formation models with degree heterogeneity raises two problems in empirical networks. First, agents that send no links, receive no links, or link to all remaining agents can make the fixed-effects MLE fail to exist. Trimming these agents changes the estimation sample and induces selection bias. Second, the incidental-parameter problem biases common parameters and average partial effects. We resolve both issues through a penalized likelihood approach. Our…

逻辑回归中变量选择与模型平均方法的比较AI 解读

Model uncertainty is a central challenge in statistical models for binary outcomes such as logistic regression, arising when it is unclear which predictors should be included in the model. Many methods have been proposed to address this issue for logistic regression, but their relative performance under realistic conditions remains poorly understood. We therefore conducted a preregistered, simulation-based comparison of 28 established methods for variable selection and…

GEEPERs：利用主分层评分与堆叠估计方程进行主分层分析AI 解读

Principal stratification is a framework for making sense of causal effects conditioned on variables that may themselves have been affected by the treatment. For instance, in an evaluation of an educational intervention, some subjects in the treatment group may not fully utilize the intervention, and researchers may be interested in how this subgroup is affected. Most principal stratification estimators rely on strong structural or modeling assumptions and often require…

采用结局优劣排序端点的整群随机试验AI 解读

Cluster randomized trials are widely used when individual randomization is logistically infeasible or when correlations between observations cannot be ignored, especially in fields such as ophthalmology, infectious disease, vaccine research, and sociology. The desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) framework evaluates patient-centric benefit-risk using an ordinal outcome and a Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney statistic-based approach to compare outcome distributions between…

利用多个环境双重稳健识别处理效应AI 解读

Practical and ethical constraints often require the use of observational data for causal inference, particularly in medicine and social sciences. Yet, observational datasets are prone to confounding, potentially compromising the validity of causal conclusions. While it is possible to correct for biases if the underlying causal graph is known, this is rarely a feasible ask in practical scenarios. A common strategy is to adjust for all available covariates, yet this approach…