跳到正文
简报说明

来源与收录范围

汇总期刊目录中的 16 个期刊来源,以及 arXiv 计量经济学与相关统计、金融分类和主题检索中的预印本。期刊题录主要来自 Crossref,可靠摘要保留补充来源;期刊官网链接可在论文检索的说明中核对。

保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。待核验、范围外及撤回记录不进入公开简报。基础文献按学习与研究需要单独选编。

此前日简报及周、月简报按可核实的原站发表、首次提交和修订日期归档;历史补录只留在文献库。期刊仅纳入收录当月新发表或提前取得题录的论文;只有月份的记录仅进入对应月简报。arXiv 同期只计一次,首次发布优先;未保存的中间版本无法补算。撤回内容会同步移除;所有历史补录仍可在论文检索中查找。

当前结果:已发表 0 篇 · 待刊 0 篇 · 预印本 8 篇

关键词匹配标题、摘要、作者或 DOI;支持部分字母,多词同时匹配,双引号匹配短语。

本期动态按期刊、arXiv 首次发布、arXiv 修订分组,组内默认本文引用优先。也可选择作者引用优先或最新收录。

期刊论文在前,预印本在后。组内先看本文引用,再看已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,最后按当前日期顺序排序。

“作者引用”指已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,不合计共同作者。目前作者指标只来自有身份关联快照的预印本,普通期刊条目可能没有该项数据;本页 0/8 篇有可核验作者指标。

本文引用采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本;缺失不记作零。累计引用会随时间积累,可结合近年范围比较;引用数和作者发表经历是阅读线索,不代表论文质量或同行评审状态。

“作者发表记录”展示作者已有论文的可核验发表记录,不证明该预印本已接收或通过同行评审。

正常题录、可靠摘要和引用同步继续;AI 解读依据可靠材料,材料不足时保留待解读状态。

本期 8 篇
导出

arXiv · 本期修订

Visual Analysis of Multi-outcome Causal Graphs

多结局因果图的可视分析

We introduce a visual analysis method for multiple causal graphs with different outcome variables, namely, multi-outcome causal graphs. Multi-outcome causal graphs are important in healthcare for understanding multimorbidity and comorbidity. To support the visual analysis, we collaborated with medical experts to devise two comparative visualization techniques at different stages of the analysis process. First, a progressive visualization method is proposed for comparing…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Misclassification in Difference-in-differences Models

双重差分模型中的处理变量误分类

The difference-in-differences (DID) design is one of the most popular methods used in empirical economics research. However, there is almost no work examining what the DID method identifies in the presence of a misclassified treatment variable. This paper studies the identification of treatment effects in DID designs when the treatment is misclassified. Misclassification arises in various ways, including when the timing of a policy intervention is ambiguous or when…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Minimax Regret Estimation for Generalizing Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Multisite Data

多地点异质性处理效应推广的极小极大遗憾估计

To test scientific theories and develop individualized treatment rules, researchers often wish to learn heterogeneous treatment effects that can be consistently found across diverse populations and contexts. We consider the problem of generalizing heterogeneous treatment effects (HTE) based on data from multiple sites. A key challenge is that a target population may differ from the source sites in unknown and unobservable ways. This means that the estimates from…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

CausalCompass: Evaluating the Robustness of Time-Series Causal Discovery in Misspecified Scenarios

CausalCompass:模型错设情景下时间序列因果发现的稳健性评估

Causal discovery from time series is a fundamental task in machine learning. However, its widespread adoption is hindered by a reliance on untestable causal assumptions and by the lack of robustness-oriented evaluation in existing benchmarks. To address these challenges, we propose CausalCompass, a flexible and extensible benchmark framework designed to assess the robustness of time-series causal discovery (TSCD) methods under violations of modeling assumptions. To…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Sufficient Statistics for Markovian Feedback Processes and Unobserved Heterogeneity in Dynamic Panel Logit Models

动态面板 Logit 模型中马尔可夫反馈与不可观测异质性的充分统计量

In this paper, we examine identification in dynamic panel logit models with state dependence, a first-order Markov feedback process, and individual unobserved heterogeneity by introducing sufficient statistics for the feedback process and the unobserved heterogeneity. If a sequentially exogenous discrete covariate follows a first-order Markov process, identification via conditional likelihood is infeasible regardless of the time period. We also establish the failure of point…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A tutorial on conducting sample size and power calculations for detecting treatment effect heterogeneity in cluster randomized trials with linear mixed models

用线性混合模型检测整群随机试验处理效应异质性:样本量与功效教程

Cluster-randomized trials (CRTs) are a well-established class of designs for evaluating community-based interventions. An essential task in planning these trials is determining the number of clusters and cluster sizes needed to achieve sufficient statistical power for detecting a clinically relevant effect size. While methods for evaluating the average treatment effect (ATE) for the entire study population are well-established, sample size methods for testing heterogeneity…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Adjustment for Unmeasured Spatial Confounding in Settings of Continuous Exposure Conditional on the Binary Exposure Status: Conditional Generalized Propensity Score-Based Spatial Matching

二元暴露状态下连续暴露的条件广义倾向评分空间匹配

Propensity score (PS) matching to estimate causal effects of exposure is biased when unmeasured spatial confounding exists. Some exposures are continuous yet dependent on a binary variable (e.g., level of a contaminant (continuous) within a specified radius from residence (binary)). Further, unmeasured spatial confounding may vary by spatial patterns for both continuous and binary attributes of exposure. We propose a new generalized propensity score (GPS) matching method for…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Everything all at once: On choosing an estimand for multi-component environmental exposures

多成分环境暴露的目标量选择:联合位移如何定义

Many research questions -- particularly those in environmental health -- do not involve binary exposures. In environmental epidemiology, this includes multivariate exposure mixtures with nondiscrete components. Causal inference estimands and estimators to quantify the relationship between an exposure mixture and an outcome are relatively few. We propose an approach to quantify a relationship between a shift in the exposure mixture and the outcome -- either in the single…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓