跳到正文
简报说明

来源与收录范围

汇总期刊目录中的 16 个期刊来源,以及 arXiv 计量经济学与相关统计、金融分类和主题检索中的预印本。期刊题录主要来自 Crossref,可靠摘要保留补充来源;期刊官网链接可在论文检索的说明中核对。

保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。待核验、范围外及撤回记录不进入公开简报。基础文献按学习与研究需要单独选编。

期刊按可核实的首次发表日期归档;仅纳入收录当月新发表或已提前取得题录的论文,历史补录只留在文献库。只有月份的记录仅进入对应月简报,只有年份或日期待核的不进简报。arXiv 按原站 UTC 首次提交日和当前版本修订日分组,同期只计一次,首次发布优先;未保存的中间版本无法补算。撤回内容会同步移除;所有历史补录仍可在论文检索中查找。

当前结果:已发表 0 篇 · 待刊 0 篇 · 预印本 10 篇

关键词匹配标题、摘要、作者或 DOI;支持部分字母,多词同时匹配,双引号匹配短语。

本期动态按期刊、arXiv 首次发布、arXiv 修订分组,组内默认本文引用优先。也可选择作者引用优先或最新收录。

期刊论文在前,预印本在后。组内先看本文引用,再看已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,最后按当前日期顺序排序。

“作者引用”指已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,不合计共同作者。目前作者指标只来自有身份关联快照的预印本,普通期刊条目可能没有该项数据;本页 0/10 篇有可核验作者指标。

本文引用采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本;缺失不记作零。累计引用会随时间积累,可结合近年范围比较;引用数和作者发表经历是阅读线索,不代表论文质量或同行评审状态。

“作者发表记录”展示作者已有论文的可核验发表记录,不证明该预印本已接收或通过同行评审。

正常题录、可靠摘要和引用同步继续;AI 解读依据可靠材料,材料不足时保留待解读状态。

本期 10 篇
导出

arXiv · 本期首次发布

Regression Adjustments for Double Randomization in Two-Sided Marketplaces

双边市场双重随机化实验的回归调整

Multiple randomization designs (MRDs) are a class of experimental designs used to handle interference in two-sided marketplaces. We investigate regression adjustment strategies for estimating total, spillover, and direct effects in MRDs. We derive minimum asymptotic variance estimators among a broad class of linearly adjusted estimators, without assuming a linear model on the potential outcomes. Surprisingly, the optimal regression adjustments are estimable from data and are…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Inference in Regression Discontinuity Designs with Clustered Data

聚类数据下回归不连续设计的推断

Clustered sampling is prevalent in empirical regression discontinuity (RD) designs, but it has not received much attention in the theoretical literature. In this paper, we introduce a general model-based framework for such settings and derive high-level conditions under which the standard local linear RD estimator is asymptotically normal. We verify that our high-level assumptions hold across a wide range of empirical designs, including settings of growing cluster sizes. We…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Synthetic Control Misconceptions: Recommendations for Practice

合成控制的常见误解与实践建议

To estimate the causal effect of an intervention, researchers need to identify a control group that represents what might have happened to the treatment group in the absence of that intervention. This is challenging without a randomized experiment and further complicated when few units (possibly only one) are treated. Nevertheless, when data are available on units over time, synthetic control (SC) methods provide an opportunity to construct a valid comparison by…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Multi-Domain Empirical Bayes for Linearly-Mixed Causal Representations

线性混合因果表征的多域经验贝叶斯学习

Causal representation learning (CRL) aims to learn low-dimensional causal latent variables from high-dimensional observations. While identifiability has been extensively studied for CRL, estimation has been less explored. In this paper, we explore the use of empirical Bayes (EB) to estimate causal representations. In particular, we consider the problem of learning from data from multiple domains, where differences between domains are modeled by interventions in a shared…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

arXiv · 本期修订

Combining T-learning and DR-learning: a framework for oracle-efficient estimation of causal contrasts

结合 T-learning 与 DR-learning:因果对比的 oracle 有效估计框架

We introduce efficient plug-in (EP) learning, a novel framework for the estimation of heterogeneous causal contrasts, such as the conditional average treatment effect and conditional relative risk. The EP-learning framework enjoys the same oracle efficiency as Neyman-orthogonal learning strategies, such as DR-learning and R-learning, while addressing some of their primary drawbacks: (i) their practical applicability can be hindered by non-convex loss functions; and (ii) they…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Identification of Long-Term Treatment Effects via Temporal Links, Observational, and Experimental Data

通过时间关联、观察与实验数据识别长期处理效应

Recent literature proposes combining short-term experimental and long-term observational data to provide alternatives to conventional observational studies for the identification of long-term average treatment effects (LTEs). This paper re-examines the identification problem and uncovers that assumptions restricting temporal link functions -- relationships between short-term and mean long-term potential outcomes -- are central in this context. The experimental data serve to…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Limit Theorems for Network Data without Metric Structure

无度量结构网络数据的极限定理

This paper develops limit theorems for random variables with network dependence, without requiring the individuals in the network to be located in a Euclidean or metric space. This distinguishes our approach from most existing limit theorems in network statistics and econometrics, which are based on weak dependence concepts such as strong mixing, near-epoch dependence, or $ψ$-dependence. All these weak dependence concepts presuppose an underlying metric. By relaxing the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A proxy-based approach for unmeasured confounding in electronic health records research

电子健康记录研究中处理未测混杂的代理变量方法

Electronic health records (EHR) are widely used to study clinical decisions, yet unmeasured confounding remains a persistent challenge. Proxy variables offer a potential solution. In EHR data, clinicians already record many such measurements (e.g., vitals), each revealing something about a patient's underlying health. Despite this, proxy-based methods are rarely used in practice. We introduce a new way to use proxies to adjust for unmeasured confounding. Our approach uses a…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Efficient and Accessible Discrete Choice Experiments: The DCEtool Package for R

高效且易用的离散选择实验:R 包 DCEtool

Discrete Choice Experiments (DCEs) are widely used to elicit preferences for products or services by analyzing choices among alternatives described by their attributes. The quality of the insights obtained from a DCE heavily depends on the properties of its experimental design. While early DCEs often relied on linear criteria such as orthogonality, these approaches were later found to be inappropriate for discrete choice models, which are inherently non-linear. As a result,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Which Covariates to Adjust for? Specification-robust Causal Inference in Observational Studies

应调整哪些协变量?观察研究中对模型设定稳健的因果推断

In observational causal inference, domain knowledge often leaves multiple covariate adjustments plausible, yet which sets satisfy ignorability is untestable. Different adjustment sets can yield conflicting estimates of the average treatment effect, and standard remedies (adjusting for their union or intersection, or reporting the union or convex hull of confidence intervals) can fail or produce intervals whose width does not vanish with sample size. We propose a…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓