跳到正文
简报说明

来源与收录范围

汇总期刊目录中的 16 个期刊来源,以及 arXiv 计量经济学与相关统计、金融分类和主题检索中的预印本。期刊题录主要来自 Crossref,可靠摘要保留补充来源;期刊官网链接可在论文检索的说明中核对。

保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。待核验、范围外及撤回记录不进入公开简报。基础文献按学习与研究需要单独选编。

期刊按可核实的首次发表日期归档;仅纳入收录当月新发表或已提前取得题录的论文,历史补录只留在文献库。只有月份的记录仅进入对应月简报,只有年份或日期待核的不进简报。arXiv 按原站 UTC 首次提交日和当前版本修订日分组,同期只计一次,首次发布优先;未保存的中间版本无法补算。撤回内容会同步移除;所有历史补录仍可在论文检索中查找。

当前结果:已发表 0 篇 · 待刊 0 篇 · 预印本 10 篇

关键词匹配标题、摘要、作者或 DOI;支持部分字母,多词同时匹配,双引号匹配短语。

本期动态按期刊、arXiv 首次发布、arXiv 修订分组,组内默认本文引用优先。也可选择作者引用优先或最新收录。

期刊论文在前,预印本在后。组内先看本文引用,再看已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,最后按当前日期顺序排序。

“作者引用”指已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,不合计共同作者。目前作者指标只来自有身份关联快照的预印本,普通期刊条目可能没有该项数据;本页 1/10 篇有可核验作者指标。

本文引用采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本;缺失不记作零。累计引用会随时间积累,可结合近年范围比较;引用数和作者发表经历是阅读线索,不代表论文质量或同行评审状态。

“作者发表记录”展示作者已有论文的可核验发表记录,不证明该预印本已接收或通过同行评审。

正常题录、可靠摘要和引用同步继续;AI 解读依据可靠材料,材料不足时保留待解读状态。

本期 10 篇
导出

arXiv · 本期首次发布

A Doubly Robust Machine Learning Approach for Disentangling Treatment Effect Heterogeneity with Functional Outcomes

分解函数型结局处理效应异质性的双重稳健机器学习方法

Causal inference is paramount for understanding the effects of interventions, yet extracting personalized insights from increasingly complex data remains a significant challenge for modern machine learning. This is the case, in particular, when considering functional outcomes observed over a continuous domain (e.g., time, or space). Estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects, known as CATE, has emerged as a crucial tool for personalized decision-making, but existing…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Who's Winning? Clarifying Estimands Based on Win Statistics in Cluster Randomized Trials

谁占优势?澄清整群随机试验中基于胜出统计量的估计目标

Treatment effect estimands based on win statistics, including the win ratio, win odds, and win difference are increasingly popular targets for summarizing endpoints in clinical trials. Such win estimands offer an intuitive approach for prioritizing outcomes by clinical importance. The implementation and interpretation of win estimands is complicated in cluster randomized trials (CRTs), where researchers can target fundamentally different estimands on the individual-level or…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Covariate-Adaptive Randomization in Clinical Trials without Inflated Variances

不膨胀协变量不平衡方差的临床试验自适应随机化

Covariate adaptive randomization (CAR) procedures are extensively used to reduce the likelihood of covariate imbalances occurring in clinical trials. In literatures, a lot of CAR procedures have been proposed so that the specified covariates are balanced well between treatments. However, the variance of the imbalance of the unspecified covariates may be inflated comparing to the one under the simple randomization. The inflation of the variance causes the usual test of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

arXiv · 本期修订

Instrumented Difference-in-Differences with Heterogeneous Treatment Effects

异质处理效应下的工具变量双重差分

Many studies exploit variation in the timing of policy adoption across units as an instrument for treatment. This paper formalizes the underlying identification strategy as an instrumented difference-in-differences (DID-IV). In this design, a Wald-DID estimand, which scales the DID estimand of the outcome by the DID estimand of the treatment, captures the local average treatment effect on the treated (LATET). We extend the canonical DID-IV design to multiple period settings…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Empirical Bayes Estimation in Heterogeneous Coefficient Panel Models

异质系数面板模型中的经验贝叶斯估计

We develop an empirical Bayes (EB) G-modeling framework for short-panel linear models with nonparametric prior for the random intercepts, slopes, dynamics, and non-spherical error variances. We establish identification and consistency of the nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator (NPMLE) under general conditions, and provide low-level sufficient conditions for several models of empirical interest. Conditions for regret consistency of the EB estimators are also…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Distributional Instruments: Identification and Estimation with Quantile Least Squares

分布型工具变量:识别与分位数最小二乘估计

We study instrumental-variable designs where policy reforms strongly shift the distribution of an endogenous variable but only weakly move its mean. We formalize this by introducing distributional relevance: instruments may be purely distributional. Within a triangular model, distributional relevance suffices for nonparametric identification of average structural effects via a control function. We then propose Quantile Least Squares (Q-LS), which aggregates conditional…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Simultaneous Graphical Dynamic Modeling

联立图式动态建模

We review theory and methodology of the class of simultaneous graphical dynamic linear models (SGDLMs) that provide flexibility, parsimony and scalability of multivariate time series analysis. Discussion includes core theoretical aspects and summaries of existing Bayesian methodology for forward filtering and forecasting with SGDLMs. The review is complemented by new theory linking dynamic graphical and factor models, and extensions of the Bayesian methodology. This…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A Frequentist Approach to Revealed Preference Analysis

显示偏好分析的频率学派方法

This paper develops a framework to study the statistical power of revealed-preference tests. With randomly sampled budgets and mild smoothness of demand, statistical learning implies that any model consistent with the data must approximate true choice behaviour. We interpret this result as follows: passing a revealed-preference test is informative only to the extent that the data are sufficiently rich to rule out economically meaningful departures from the maintained model.…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Modern Causal Inference Approaches to Improve Power for Subgroup Analysis in Randomized Controlled Trials

利用现代因果推断提高随机对照试验亚组分析的检验力

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) often include subgroup analyses to assess whether treatment effects vary across pre-specified patient populations. However, these analyses frequently suffer from small sample sizes which limit the power to detect heterogeneous effects. Power can be improved by leveraging predictors of the outcome -- i.e., through covariate adjustment -- as well as by borrowing external data from similar RCTs or observational studies. The benefits of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Doubly robust augmented weighting estimators for the analysis of externally controlled single-arm trials and unanchored indirect treatment comparisons

外部对照单臂试验与非锚定间接治疗比较的双重稳健增广加权估计

Externally controlled single-arm trials are critical to assess treatment efficacy across therapeutic indications for which randomized controlled trials are not feasible. A closely-related research design, the unanchored indirect treatment comparison, is often required for disconnected treatment networks in health technology assessment. We present a unified causal inference framework for both research designs. We develop a novel estimator that augments a popular weighting…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓