跳到正文
简报说明

来源与收录范围

汇总期刊目录中的 16 个期刊来源,以及 arXiv 计量经济学与相关统计、金融分类和主题检索中的预印本。期刊题录主要来自 Crossref,可靠摘要保留补充来源;期刊官网链接可在论文检索的说明中核对。

保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。待核验、范围外及撤回记录不进入公开简报。基础文献按学习与研究需要单独选编。

此前日简报及周、月简报按可核实的原站发表、首次提交和修订日期归档;历史补录只留在文献库。期刊仅纳入收录当月新发表或提前取得题录的论文;只有月份的记录仅进入对应月简报。arXiv 同期只计一次,首次发布优先;未保存的中间版本无法补算。撤回内容会同步移除;所有历史补录仍可在论文检索中查找。

当前结果:已发表 0 篇 · 待刊 0 篇 · 预印本 6 篇

关键词匹配标题、摘要、作者或 DOI;支持部分字母,多词同时匹配,双引号匹配短语。

本期动态按期刊、arXiv 首次发布、arXiv 修订分组,组内默认本文引用优先。也可选择作者引用优先或最新收录。

期刊论文在前,预印本在后。组内先看本文引用,再看已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,最后按当前日期顺序排序。

“作者引用”指已有明确关联作者的最高累计引用,不合计共同作者。目前作者指标只来自有身份关联快照的预印本,普通期刊条目可能没有该项数据;本页 0/6 篇有可核验作者指标。

本文引用采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本;缺失不记作零。累计引用会随时间积累,可结合近年范围比较;引用数和作者发表经历是阅读线索,不代表论文质量或同行评审状态。

“作者发表记录”展示作者已有论文的可核验发表记录,不证明该预印本已接收或通过同行评审。

正常题录、可靠摘要和引用同步继续;AI 解读依据可靠材料,材料不足时保留待解读状态。

本期 6 篇
导出

arXiv · 本期首次发布

An Infinite BART model

Bayesian additive regression trees (BART) is a popular Bayesian ensemble model used in regression and classification analysis. Under this modeling framework, the regression function is approximated by an ensemble of decision trees, interpreted as weak learners. In this work, we propose a generalization of the BART model that has two main features: first, it automatically selects the number of decision trees using the given data; second, the model allows clusters of…

阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A Large Scale Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimation Framework and Its Applications of Users' Journey at Snap

大规模异质性处理效应估计框架及其在 Snap 用户历程中的应用

Heterogeneous Treatment Effect (HTE) and Conditional Average Treatment Effect (CATE) models relax the assumption that treatment effects are the same for every user. We present a large scale industrial framework for estimating HTE using experimental data from hundreds of millions of Snapchat users. By combining results across many experiments, the framework uncovers latent user characteristics that were previously unmeasurable and produces stable treatment effect estimates at…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Differentially Private Tests of Fisher's Sharp Null Hypothesis for Binary Outcomes

二元结局下 Fisher 尖锐零假设的差分隐私检验

Across many disciplines, causal inference often relies on randomized experiments with binary outcomes. In such experiments, often analysts are interested in testing Fisher's sharp null hypothesis, i.e., the treatment has zero effect on the outcome for every study subject. Sometimes the outcomes are sensitive and must be kept confidential, for example, when they comprise physical or mental health measurements. Releasing test statistics or p-values computed with the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Calibrated Bayes analysis of cluster-randomized trials

整群随机试验的校准贝叶斯分析

In cluster-randomized trials (CRTs), entire clusters of individuals are randomized to treatment, and outcomes within a cluster are typically correlated. While frequentist approaches are standard practice for CRT analysis, Bayesian methods have emerged as a strong alternative. Previous work has investigated the use of Bayesian hierarchical models for continuous, binary, and count outcomes in CRTs, but these approaches focus on model-based treatment effect coefficients as the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Hierarchical Causal Structure Learning

分层因果结构学习

Traditional statistical approaches primarily model associations between variables, however many scientific and practical questions require causal methods instead. These methods typically rely on assumptions about an underlying structure and are often represented by a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG). While causal structures can be learned for single-level data, hierarchical or multi-level settings, where units (e.g., plants, students or patients) are nested within groups (e.g.,…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

arXiv · 本期修订

Training and Testing with Multiple Splits: A Central Limit Theorem for Split-Sample Estimators

多次划分下的训练与检验:分样本估计量的中心极限定理

As predictive algorithms grow in popularity, using the same dataset to both train and test a new model has become routine across research, policy, and industry. Sample-splitting attains valid inference on model properties by using separate subsamples to estimate the model and to evaluate it. However, this approach has two drawbacks, since each task uses only part of the data, and different splits can lead to widely different estimates. Averaging across multiple splits, I…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓