论文检索

利用解偏变量进行因果推断AI 解读

This paper shows that incorporating what we call antidotal variables (AV) into a causal treatment effects analysis can with one cross-sectional regression identify the causal effect, the spillover effect, as well as possible biases from selectivity. We apply the AV technique to analyze leave taking arising from the California Paid Family Leave (CPFL) program. Our analysis yields between a 55% and 70% larger treatment effect than the traditional DID methods, which we…

用分布回归双重差分评估最低工资引入对工资、收入与工时分布的影响AI 解读

ABSTRACT We estimate the causal effects of the introduction of the minimum wage in Germany on the distributions of hourly wages, monthly earnings, and hours worked, combining rich large‐scale data sources. We compare linear and non‐linear versions of distribution regression difference‐in‐differences (DR‐DiD) and also estimate bivariate DR‐DiD. We show that the introduction of the minimum wage in 2015 led to shifts in low hourly wages around the minimum wage threshold…

存在少报的有序选择模型中的变化中的变化AI 解读

We develop a Difference-in-Differences framework for discrete, ordered outcomes subject to underreporting. Such outcomes commonly arise in self-reported surveys on socially undesirable or stigmatized behaviors, where respondents may conceal their true behavior. For a discrete Changes-in-Changes model that is shown to admit an equivalent threshold-crossing representation, we derive nonparametric bounds for the counterfactual and factual outcome distributions as well as for…

测地线双重差分AI 解读

Summary Difference-in-differences (DID) is a widely used quasi-experimental design for causal inference, traditionally applied to scalar or Euclidean outcomes, while extensions to outcomes residing in non-Euclidean spaces remain limited. Existing methods for such outcomes have primarily focused on univariate distributions, leveraging linear operations in the space of quantile functions, but these approaches cannot be directly extended to outcomes in general metric spaces. In…

存在干扰时的双重差分AI 解读

In many scenarios, such as the evaluation of place-based policies, potential outcomes depend not only on the unit’s own treatment but also on its neighbors’ treatments. Despite this, “difference-in-differences” (DID) type estimators typically ignore such interference among neighbors. I show in this paper that the canonical DID estimators generally fail to identify interesting causal effects in the presence of neighborhood interference. To incorporate interference structure…

异质性下百分点平均处理效应的估计与推断AI 解读

In semi-logarithmic regressions, treatment coefficients are often interpreted as approximations of an average treatment effect (ATE) in percentage points. This paper highlights the overlooked bias of this approximation under treatment effect heterogeneity, arising from Jensen’s inequality. The issue is particularly relevant for difference-in-differences designs with log-transformed outcomes and staggered treatment adoption, where treatment effects may vary across groups and…

三重稳健面板估计量AI 解读

ABSTRACT This paper studies estimation of causal effects in a panel data setting. We introduce a new estimator, the Triply Robust Panel (TROP) estimator, that combines a flexible model for the potential outcomes based on a low‐rank factor structure on top of a two‐way‐fixed effect specification, with unit weights intended to upweight units similar to the treated units and time weights intended to upweight time periods close to the treated time periods. We study the…

面板双重差分估计的简单变换方法AI 解读

In the case of panel data with staggered interventions, we propose a simple time-series transformation that can be combined with various treatment effect estimators. The transformation is at the unit level, and simply requires computing the average outcome prior to an intervention, subtracting it from a post-treatment outcome, and then carefully selecting the control units in each time period. We show that under no anticipation and parallel trends assumptions, the cohort…

无混杂与共同趋势的联合检验AI 解读

ABSTRACT We introduce an overidentification test of two alternative assumptions to identify the average treatment effect on the treated in a two‐period panel data setting: unconfoundedness and common trends. Under unconfoundedness, treatment assignment and post‐treatment outcomes are independent, conditional on control variables and pre‐treatment outcomes, which motivates including the pre‐treatment outcomes in the set of controls. Under common trends, the trend and the…

协变量分布迁移下的自动去偏机器学习AI 解读

Summary We present machine learning estimators for causal and predictive parameters under covariate shift, where covariate distributions differ between training and target populations. One such parameter is the average effect of a policy that alters the covariate distribution, such as a treatment that modifies surrogate covariates used to predict long-term outcomes. Another example is the average treatment effect for a population with a shifted covariate distribution. We…

析因双重差分AI 解读

We formulate factorial difference-in-differences (FDID), a research design that extends canonical difference-in-differences (DID) to settings in which an event affects all units. In many panel data applications, researchers exploit cross-sectional variation in a baseline factor alongside temporal variation in the event, but the corresponding estimand is often implicit and the justification for applying the DID estimator remains unclear. We frame FDID as a factorial design…

双重稳健的交错双重差分组别—时期条件平均处理效应一致置信带AI 解读

We consider a panel data analysis to examine the heterogeneity in treatment effects with respect to groups, periods, and a pre-treatment covariate of interest in the staggered difference-in-differences setting of Callaway and Sant’Anna. Under standard identification conditions, a doubly robust estimand conditional on the covariate identifies the group-time conditional average treatment effect given the covariate. Focusing on the case of a continuous covariate, we propose a…

观察性研究中的效应混杂AI 解读

In experimental design, aliasing of effects occurs in fractional factorial experiments, where certain low order factorial effects are indistinguishable from certain high order interactions: low order contrast weights may be orthogonal to one another, while their higher order interactions are aliased and not identified. In observational studies, aliasing occurs when certain combinations of covariates—for example, time period and various eligibility criteria for…

存在样本构成变化的双重差分AI 解读

This paper studies Difference-in-Differences (DiD) setups with repeated cross-sectional data and potential compositional changes across time periods. We begin our analysis by deriving the efficient influence function and the semiparametric efficiency bound for the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT). We introduce nonparametric estimators that attain the semiparametric efficiency bound under mild rate conditions on the estimators of the nuisance functions,…

细粒度情境中的空间经济学AI 解读

We examine the application of quantitative spatial models to the growing body of fine spatial data used to study local economic outcomes. In granular settings in which people choose from a large set of potential residence‐workplace pairs, observed outcomes in part reflect idiosyncratic choices. Using analytical examples, Monte Carlo simulations, and event studies of neighborhood employment booms, we demonstrate that calibration procedures that equate observed shares and…

基于局部投影的双重差分方法AI 解读

ABSTRACT We propose a local projections (LPs)‐based difference‐in‐differences (DiD) approach that subsumes many of the recent solutions proposed in the literature to address possible biases arising from negative weighting. We combine LPs with a flexible “clean control” condition to define appropriate sets of treated and control units. Our proposed LP‐DiD estimator can be implemented with various weighting and normalization schemes for different target estimands, can be…

双重差分因果森林及其在挪威工资税负担归宿中的应用AI 解读

ABSTRACT This paper introduces the difference‐in‐difference causal forest (DiDCF) method, which extends the causal‐forest technique for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects to settings with dynamic treatment effects. Regular causal forests require independence between treatment assignment and the outcome variable (after conditioning out observables). In contrast, DiDCFs provide consistent estimates with a parallel trend assumption. DiDCFs can be used to create…

用于政策学习的半参数工具变量双重差分方法AI 解读

Summary Recently, there has been a surge in methodological development for the difference-in-differences approach to evaluate causal effects. Standard methods in the literature rely on the parallel-trend assumption to identify the average treatment effect on the treated. However, the parallel-trend assumption may be violated in the presence of unmeasured confounding, and the average treatment effect on the treated may not be useful in learning a treatment assignment policy…

交错处理设计中双向固定效应估计量的比较分析AI 解读

Two-way fixed effects (TWFE) is a flexible and widely used approach for estimating treatment effects, and several TWFE estimators have been proposed for staggered treatment designs. This paper focuses on the extended TWFE estimator, introduced by Borusyak et al. (2024) and Wooldridge (2021), and compares it with alternative TWFE estimators. The main contribution is the derivation of an equation that connects the extended TWFE estimator with the difference-in-differences…

工作场所同伴对未来工资的影响AI 解读

ABSTRACT This paper examines workplace peer effects in two directions, leveraging employer‐employee data for Italy. First, using a novel estimation approach and addressing endogenous worker‐peer sorting, we estimate that a 10% increase in peer quality raises one's wage by 1.8% in the next year. The effect declines to 0.7% after 5 years. Second, in an event study around mobility episodes, we quantify wage changes associated with the entry and leave of high‐quality and…

美国最低工资与青少年生育AI 解读

ABSTRACT The minimum wage is increasingly viewed as an important, but often neglected, tool for improving public health outcomes. Using data from the period 2003–2019 and a stacked difference‐in‐differences regression model that accounts for dynamic and heterogeneous treatment effects, we explore the relationship between minimum wages and teenage childbearing in the United States. We find no evidence of a systematic, negative relationship between minimum wages and…

处理状态误分类下的双重差分AI 解读

ABSTRACT This paper studies identification and estimation of the average treatment effect of a latent treated subpopulation in difference‐in‐difference designs when the observed treatment is differentially (or endogenously) mismeasured for the truth. Common examples include misreporting and mistargeting. We propose a two‐step estimator that corrects for the empirically common phenomenon of one‐sided misclassification in the treatment status. The solution uses a single…

已处理者分位数处理效应的双重差分估计量AI 解读

We propose a new difference-in-differences (DID) estimator of the quantile treatment effect on the treated (QTT). The model assumes a common time effect on the cumulative distribution functions of untreated potential outcomes, allowing for covariates. This condition holds if and only if the net change in the untreated outcome densities is common across treated and control groups. Unlike the Changes-in-Changes model proposed by Athey and Imbens (2006), our model is compatible…

双重差分回归的标准误AI 解读

ABSTRACT This paper makes a case for the use of jackknife methods for standard error, value, and confidence interval construction for difference‐in‐difference (DiD) regression. We review cluster‐robust, bootstrap, and jackknife standard error methods and show that standard methods can substantially underperform in conventional settings. In contrast, our proposed jackknife inference methods work well in broad contexts. We illustrate the relevance by replicating several…