论文检索

面向分布福利的政策学习AI 解读

In this paper, we explore optimal treatment allocation policies that target distributional welfare. Most literature on treatment choice has considered utilitarian welfare based on the conditional average treatment effect (ATE). While average welfare is intuitive, it may yield undesirable allocations especially when individuals are heterogeneous (e.g., with outliers)—the very reason individualized treatments were introduced in the first place. This observation motivates us to…

未测量混杂下的连续行动强化学习AI 解读

This article addresses the challenge of offline policy learning in continuous action spaces when unmeasured confounders are present. While most existing research focuses on policy evaluation within partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) and assumes discrete action spaces, we advance this field by establishing a novel identification result to enable the nonparametric estimation of policy value for a given target policy under an infinite-horizon framework.…

用于政策学习的半参数工具变量双重差分方法AI 解读

Summary Recently, there has been a surge in methodological development for the difference-in-differences approach to evaluate causal effects. Standard methods in the literature rely on the parallel-trend assumption to identify the average treatment effect on the treated. However, the parallel-trend assumption may be violated in the presence of unmeasured confounding, and the average treatment effect on the treated may not be useful in learning a treatment assignment policy…

半参数近端因果推断AI 解读

Skepticism about the assumption of no unmeasured confounding, also known as exchangeability, is often warranted in making causal inferences from observational data; because exchangeability hinges on an investigator's ability to accurately measure covariates that capture all potential sources of confounding.In practice, the most one can hope for is that covariate measurements are at best proxies of the true underlying confounding mechanism operating in a given observational…

时变处理的边际结构均值模型：工具变量估计AI 解读

Robins introduced Marginal Structural Models (MSMs), a general class of counterfactual models for the joint effects of time-varying treatment regimes in complex longitudinal studies subject to time-varying confounding. In his work, identification of MSM parameters is established under a Sequential Randomization Assumption (SRA), which rules out unmeasured confounding of treatment assignment over time. We consider sufficient conditions for identification of the parameters of…

利用因果生存森林估计右删失数据中的异质性处理效应AI 解读

Abstract Forest-based methods have recently gained in popularity for non-parametric treatment effect estimation. Building on this line of work, we introduce causal survival forests, which can be used to estimate heterogeneous treatment effects in survival and observational setting where outcomes may be right-censored. Our approach relies on orthogonal estimating equations to robustly adjust for both censoring and selection effects under unconfoundedness. In our experiments,…

反事实世界中的个体化决策机器智能：作者回复AI 解读

This JASA rejoinder concerns the problem of individualized decision making under point, sign, and partial identification. The paper unifies various classical decision making strategies through a lower bound perspective proposed in Cui and Tchetgen Tchetgen (2020b) in the context of optimal treatment regimes under uncertainty due to unmeasured confounding. Building on this unified framework, the paper also provides a novel minimax solution (i.e., a rule that minimizes the…

内生性下最优治疗规则的半参数工具变量方法AI 解读

There is a fast-growing literature on estimating optimal treatment regimes based on randomized trials or observational studies under a key identifying condition of no unmeasured confounding. Because confounding by unmeasured factors cannot generally be ruled out with certainty in observational studies or randomized trials subject to noncompliance, we propose a general instrumental variable (IV) approach to learning optimal treatment regimes under endogeneity. Specifically,…