跳到正文
收录说明
收录范围
保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础,以及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。书评、刊务及明确无关内容不公开;身份或相关性证据不足的记录保留待核,补充可靠材料后可重新判断。
当前期刊来源见下方官网链接及期刊目录。综合经济学与金融期刊逐篇筛查计量方向,证据不足时暂不公开。正刊、在线优先论文和已核实接收稿合并展示;按标题、可靠摘要、目录及身份匹配的出版社 JEL 分类核验相关性;计量类 JEL 与摘要相互印证,无 JEL 不直接排除。历史回补以可取得的注册题录和目录为准,不等于覆盖全部纸本。
日期与排序
默认按最近发表排序:正刊使用刊期,待刊使用上线日期;缺少上线日期时,排序参考登记或首次收录时间,并在卡片注明。更多筛选可选择出版状态和日期口径;卷期依据出版社元数据,不因待刊时间较长而推定已编入正刊。仅有月份或年份时,日期区间相交也会纳入。

日期精度:到日 8 篇 · 到月 0 篇 · 到年 0 篇

分类与引用
领域和方法依据题名、摘要初步分类,可人工修正;分类不代表论文质量。引用数采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本。
更新与 AI 解读
正常题录、可靠摘要与引用同步继续;日、周、月简报按核实的发表与修订日期汇总,历史补录保留在文献库。AI 解读依据可靠摘要或已核实原文片段,已有解读保留供阅读参考;缺少可靠材料的条目保持待解读,浏览页面不会触发生成。
8 篇论文
导出

Cross-validation with antithetic Gaussian randomization

基于对偶高斯随机化的交叉验证

Abstract We introduce a new cross-validation (CV) method based on an equicorrelated Gaussian randomization scheme. Our method is well-suited for problems where sample splitting is infeasible, either because the data violate the assumption of independent and identically distributed samples, or because there are insufficient samples to form representative train–test data pairs. In such problems, our method provides a simple, principled, and computationally efficient approach…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Inference on the Proportion of Variance Explained in Principal Component Analysis

主成分分析中方差解释比例的统计推断

Principal component analysis (PCA) is a longstanding approach for dimension reduction. It rests upon the assumption that the underlying signal has low rank, and thus can be well-summarized using a small number of dimensions. The output of PCA is typically represented using a scree plot, which displays the proportion of variance explained (PVE) by each principal component. While the PVE is extensively reported in routine analyses, to the best of our knowledge the notion of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Asymptotically-exact selective inference for quantile regression

分位数回归的渐近精确选择后推断

In modern data analysis, it is common to select a model before performing statistical inference. Selective inference tools make adjustments for the model selection process in order to ensure reliable inference post selection. In this paper, we introduce an asymptotic pivot to infer about the effects of selected variables on conditional quantile functions. Utilizing estimators from smoothed quantile regression, our proposed pivot is easy to compute and yields…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Assumption-Lean Data Fission with Resampled Data

利用重采样数据进行弱假设数据裂分

Gaussian additive noise data fission is described in Tian and Taylor (2018) and expanded in Rasines and Young (2022). This current work, Leiner et al. (2025), expands greatly on this idea by creati...

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Exact selective inference with randomization

随机化选择后的精确推断

Summary We introduce a pivot for exact selective inference with randomization. Not only does our pivot lead to exact inference in Gaussian regression models, but it is also available in closed form. We reduce this problem to inference for a bivariate truncated Gaussian variable. By doing so, we give up some power that is achieved with approximate maximum likelihood estimation in Panigrahi & Taylor (2023). Yet our pivot always produces narrower confidence intervals than a…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Carving model-free inference

数据雕刻的无模型推断

Complex studies involve many steps. Selecting promising findings based on pilot data is a first step. As more observations are collected, the investigator must decide how to combine the new data with the pilot data to construct valid selective inference. Carving, introduced by Fithian, Sun and Taylor (2014), enables the reuse of pilot data during selective inference and accounts for overoptimism from the selection process. However, currently, carving is only justified for…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Approximate Selective Inference via Maximum Likelihood

基于最大似然的近似选择后推断

Several strategies have been developed recently to ensure valid inference after model selection; some of these are easy to compute, while others fare better in terms of inferential power. In this article, we consider a selective inference framework for Gaussian data. We propose a new method for inference through approximate maximum likelihood estimation. Our goal is to: (a) achieve better inferential power with the aid of randomization, (b) bypass expensive MCMC sampling…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Integrative methods for post-selection inference under convex constraints

凸约束下选择后推断的整合方法

Inference after model selection has been an active research topic in the past few years, with numerous works offering different approaches to addressing the perils of the reuse of data. In particular, major progress has been made recently on large and useful classes of problems by harnessing general theory of hypothesis testing in exponential families, but these methods have their limitations. Perhaps most immediate is the gap between theory and practice: implementing the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓