跳到正文
收录说明
收录范围
保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础,以及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。书评、刊务及明确无关内容不公开;身份或相关性证据不足的记录保留待核,补充可靠材料后可重新判断。
当前期刊来源见下方官网链接及期刊目录。综合经济学与金融期刊逐篇筛查计量方向,证据不足时暂不公开。正刊、在线优先论文和已核实接收稿合并展示;按标题、可靠摘要、目录及身份匹配的出版社 JEL 分类核验相关性;计量类 JEL 与摘要相互印证,无 JEL 不直接排除。历史回补以可取得的注册题录和目录为准,不等于覆盖全部纸本。
日期与排序
默认按最近发表排序:正刊使用刊期,待刊使用上线日期;缺少上线日期时,排序参考登记或首次收录时间,并在卡片注明。更多筛选可选择出版状态和日期口径;卷期依据出版社元数据,不因待刊时间较长而推定已编入正刊。仅有月份或年份时,日期区间相交也会纳入。

日期精度:到日 2 篇 · 到月 2 篇 · 到年 2 篇

分类与引用
领域和方法依据题名、摘要初步分类,可人工修正;分类不代表论文质量。引用数采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本。
更新与 AI 解读
正常题录、可靠摘要与引用同步继续;日、周、月简报按核实的发表与修订日期汇总,历史补录保留在文献库。AI 解读依据可靠摘要或已核实原文片段,已有解读保留供阅读参考;缺少可靠材料的条目保持待解读,浏览页面不会触发生成。
6 篇论文
导出

Statistical Topology and the Random Interstellar Medium

统计拓扑与随机星际介质

We use topological methods to investigate the small-scale variation and local spatial characteristics of the interstellar medium (ISM) in three regions of the southern sky. We demonstrate that there are circumstances where topological methods can identify differences in distributions when conventional marginal or correlation analyses may not. We propose a nonparametric method for comparing two fields based on the counts of topological features and the geometry of the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Joint Modelling of Repeated Measurements and Time-to-Event Outcomes: Flexible Model Specification and Exact Likelihood Inference

重复测量与事件时间结局的联合建模:灵活设定与精确似然推断

Summary Random effects or shared parameter models are commonly advocated for the analysis of combined repeated measurement and event history data, including dropout from longitudinal trials. Their use in practical applications has generally been limited by computational cost and complexity, meaning that only simple special cases can be fitted by using readily available software. We propose a new approach that exploits recent distributional results for the extended skew…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

On residual plots for relative risk regression

相对风险回归中的残差图

Martingale-based residuals proposed for proportional hazards regression by Barlow & Prentice (1988) are considered. Plots of such residuals against time are shown to exhibit systematic patterns which are not a priori predictable even when the model is appropriate. For the plots to be fully useful therefore account needs to be taken of the expected pattern under the model. A simple amendment is suggested.

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A Problem with the Likelihood Ratio Test for a Change-Point Hazard Rate Model

危险率变点模型中似然比检验的一个问题

A likelihood ratio test for constant hazard against a step change alternative has received considerable attention in recent years. Additional information in the maximum likelihood estimate of the change-point can seriously affect interpretation of test results. Some simple modifications are considered for which exact percentage points can be derived. Monte Carlo power and mean squared error comparisons are encouraging.

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A problem with the likelihood ratio test for a change-point hazard rate model

变点风险率模型似然比检验的一个问题

A likelihood ratio test for constant hazard against a step change alternative has received considerable attention in recent years. Additional information in the maximum likelihood estimate of the change-point can seriously affect interpretation of test results. Some simple modifications are considered for which exact percentage points can be derived. Monte Carlo power and mean squared error comparisons are encouraging.

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓