论文检索

集约边际与广延边际上的处理效应评估AI 解读

This paper provides a solution to the evaluation of treatment effects in selective samples when neither instruments nor parametric assumptions are available. We provide sharp bounds for average treatment effects under a conditional monotonicity assumption for all principal strata, i.e. units characterizing the complete intensive and extensive margins. Most importantly, we allow for a large share of units whose selection is indifferent to treatment, e.g. due to…

样本选择下的异质处理效应界：社交媒体与政治极化应用AI 解读

We propose a method for estimation and inference for bounds for heterogeneous causal effect parameters in general sample selection models where the treatment can affect whether an outcome is observed and no exclusion restrictions are available. The method provides conditional effect bounds as functions of policy relevant pre-treatment variables. It allows for conducting valid statistical inference on the unidentified conditional effects. We use a flexible debiased/double…

局部平均处理效应的高效协变量平衡AI 解读

This article develops an empirical balancing approach for the estimation of treatment effects under two-sided noncompliance using a binary instrumental variable. The method weighs both treatment and outcome information with inverse probabilities to impose exact finite sample balance across instrument level groups. It is free of functional form assumptions on the outcome or the treatment selection step. By tailoring the loss function for the instrument propensity scores, the…

类别解释变量的收缩估计AI 解读

This paper introduces a flexible regularization approach that reduces point estimation risk of group means stemming from e.g. categorical regressors, (quasi-)experimental data or panel data models. The loss function is penalized by adding weighted squared ℓ2-norm differences between group location parameters and informative first stage estimates. Under quadratic loss, the penalized estimation problem has a simple interpretable closed-form solution that nests methods…

不规则识别与大量极端倾向得分下处理效应的有效推断AI 解读

This paper provides a framework for conducting valid inference for causal parameters without imposing strong variance or support restrictions on the propensity score. In particular, it covers the case of irregularly identified treatment effect parameters. We provide limit theorems for inverse probability weighting and doubly robust estimation of causal or counterfactual parameters that do not rely on trimming approaches. By construction the limiting distributions of these…