跳到正文
收录说明
收录范围
保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础,以及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。书评、刊务及明确无关内容不公开;身份或相关性证据不足的记录保留待核,补充可靠材料后可重新判断。
当前期刊来源见下方官网链接及期刊目录。综合经济学与金融期刊逐篇筛查计量方向,证据不足时暂不公开。正刊、在线优先论文和已核实接收稿合并展示;按标题、可靠摘要、目录及身份匹配的出版社 JEL 分类核验相关性;计量类 JEL 与摘要相互印证,无 JEL 不直接排除。历史回补以可取得的注册题录和目录为准,不等于覆盖全部纸本。
日期与排序
默认按最近发表排序:正刊使用刊期,待刊使用上线日期;缺少上线日期时,排序参考登记或首次收录时间,并在卡片注明。更多筛选可选择出版状态和日期口径;卷期依据出版社元数据,不因待刊时间较长而推定已编入正刊。仅有月份或年份时,日期区间相交也会纳入。

日期精度:到日 0 篇 · 到月 3 篇 · 到年 0 篇

分类与引用
领域和方法依据题名、摘要初步分类,可人工修正;分类不代表论文质量。引用数采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本。
更新与 AI 解读
正常题录、可靠摘要与引用同步继续;日、周、月简报按核实的发表与修订日期汇总,历史补录保留在文献库。AI 解读依据可靠摘要或已核实原文片段,已有解读保留供阅读参考;缺少可靠材料的条目保持待解读,浏览页面不会触发生成。
3 篇论文
导出

Reassessing the Predictive Power of the Yield Spread for Recessions in the United States

重新评估收益率利差对美国衰退的预测能力

ABSTRACT Rudebusch and Williams (2009) predict recessions in the United States utilising a probit model with the lagged yield spread as a real‐time predictor. Mindful of the importance of recent yield curve movements, we update their analysis and evaluate quarterly forecasts from their probit model up to the end of 2023. We also analyze lagged financial conditions as an alternative real‐time predictor. We find that both the yield spread and financial conditions perform…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Reassessing the dependence between economic growth and financial conditions since 1973

重新评估1973年以来经济增长与金融状况的依赖关系

Summary Adrian, Boyarchenko and Giannone ((2019), ABG) adapt quantile regression (QR) methods to examine the relationship between US economic growth and financial conditions. We confirm their empirical findings, using their methodology and their pre‐2016 sample. Mindful of the importance of the Covid‐19 pandemic, we extend the sample to 2021Q3 and find attenuation of the key estimated coefficients using ABG's empirical methods. Given the pandemic observations, we provide…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Long‐run monetary neutrality and long‐horizon regressions

长期货币中性与长跨度回归

Abstract A prominent test of long‐run monetary neutrality (LRMN) involves regressing long‐horizon output growth on long‐horizon money growth. We obtain limited support for LRMN with this test in long‐annual Australian, Canadian, UK and US samples. Although empirical confidence intervals yield evidence in favour of LRMN, Monte Carlo experiments reveal the power of this test is near its size. Thus, this test is unlikely to detect important deviations from LRMN. These problems…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓