跳到正文
收录说明
收录范围
保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础,以及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。书评、刊务及明确无关内容不公开;身份或相关性证据不足的记录保留待核,补充可靠材料后可重新判断。
当前期刊来源见下方官网链接及期刊目录。综合经济学与金融期刊逐篇筛查计量方向,证据不足时暂不公开。正刊、在线优先论文和已核实接收稿合并展示;按标题、可靠摘要、目录及身份匹配的出版社 JEL 分类核验相关性;计量类 JEL 与摘要相互印证,无 JEL 不直接排除。历史回补以可取得的注册题录和目录为准,不等于覆盖全部纸本。
日期与排序
默认按最近发表排序:正刊使用刊期,待刊使用上线日期;缺少上线日期时,排序参考登记或首次收录时间,并在卡片注明。更多筛选可选择出版状态和日期口径;卷期依据出版社元数据,不因待刊时间较长而推定已编入正刊。仅有月份或年份时,日期区间相交也会纳入。

日期精度:到日 2 篇 · 到月 2 篇 · 到年 0 篇

分类与引用
领域和方法依据题名、摘要初步分类,可人工修正;分类不代表论文质量。引用数采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本。
更新与 AI 解读
正常题录、可靠摘要与引用同步继续;日、周、月简报按核实的发表与修订日期汇总,历史补录保留在文献库。AI 解读依据可靠摘要或已核实原文片段,已有解读保留供阅读参考;缺少可靠材料的条目保持待解读,浏览页面不会触发生成。
4 篇论文
导出

Robust Tests of Forecast Accuracy for Factor‐Augmented Regressions With an Application to the Novel EA‐MD‐QD Dataset

因子增强回归预测准确性的稳健检验:新欧元区 EA-MD-QD 数据集应用

ABSTRACT We present four novel tests of equal predictive accuracy and encompassing á Pitarakis (2023, 2025) for factor‐augmented regressions. Factors are estimated using cross‐section averages (CAs) of grouped series and our theoretical findings are empirically relevant: asymptotic normality, robustness to an overspecification of the number of factors, tractability of different degrees of predictor persistence, and invariance to the location of structural breaks in the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Cross-Section Bootstrap for CCE Regressions with General Unknown Factors

一般未知因子下共同相关效应回归的横截面自助法

The Common Correlated Effects (CCE) approach enjoys considerable popularity for estimating factor-augmented panel data models. A key benefit is that by orthogonalizing the data on the available cross-section averages, the unobserved components are eliminated from the data, regardless of their order(s) of integration. This obviates the need for such knowledge, and makes CCE particularly attractive for macroeconomic applications, where the set of unobservables might contain…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Cross-section bootstrap for CCE regressions

共同相关效应回归的横截面 Bootstrap

The Common Correlated Effects (CCE) methodology is now well established for the analysis of factor-augmented panel data models. Yet, it is often neglected that the pooled variant is biased unless the cross-section dimension (N) of the dataset dominates the time series length (T). This is problematic for inference with typical macroeconomic datasets, where T is often equal or larger than N. In response, we establish in this paper the theoretical foundation of the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Tests of Equal Forecasting Accuracy for Nested Models with Estimated CCE Factors*

使用 CCE 估计因子的嵌套模型等预测准确性检验

In this article, we propose new tests of equal predictive ability between nested models when factor-augmented regressions are used to forecast. In contrast to the previous literature, the unknown factors are not estimated by principal components but by the common correlated effects (CCE) approach, which employs cross-sectional averages of blocks of variables. This makes for easy interpretation of the estimated factors, and the resulting tests are easy to implement and they…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓