跳到正文
收录说明
收录范围
保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础,以及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。书评、刊务及明确无关内容不公开;身份或相关性证据不足的记录保留待核,补充可靠材料后可重新判断。
当前期刊来源见下方官网链接及期刊目录。综合经济学与金融期刊逐篇筛查计量方向,证据不足时暂不公开。正刊、在线优先论文和已核实接收稿合并展示;按标题、可靠摘要、目录及身份匹配的出版社 JEL 分类核验相关性;计量类 JEL 与摘要相互印证,无 JEL 不直接排除。历史回补以可取得的注册题录和目录为准,不等于覆盖全部纸本。
日期与排序
默认按最近发表排序:正刊使用刊期,待刊使用上线日期;缺少上线日期时,排序参考登记或首次收录时间,并在卡片注明。更多筛选可选择出版状态和日期口径;卷期依据出版社元数据,不因待刊时间较长而推定已编入正刊。仅有月份或年份时,日期区间相交也会纳入。

日期精度:到日 0 篇 · 到月 8 篇 · 到年 1 篇

分类与引用
领域和方法依据题名、摘要初步分类,可人工修正;分类不代表论文质量。引用数采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本。
更新与 AI 解读
正常题录、可靠摘要与引用同步继续;日、周、月简报按核实的发表与修订日期汇总,历史补录保留在文献库。AI 解读依据可靠摘要或已核实原文片段,已有解读保留供阅读参考;缺少可靠材料的条目保持待解读,浏览页面不会触发生成。
9 篇论文
导出

Latent factor analysis in short panels

短面板中的潜在因子分析

We develop a pseudo maximum likelihood method for latent factor analysis in short panels without imposing sphericity nor Gaussianity. We derive an asymptotically uniformly most powerful invariant test for the number of factors. On a large panel of monthly U.S. stock returns, we separate month after month systematic and idiosyncratic risks in short subperiods of bear vs. bull market. We observe an uptrend in the paths of total and idiosyncratic volatilities. The systematic…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Is it alpha or beta? Decomposing hedge fund returns when models are misspecified

是 alpha 还是 beta?模型误设下的对冲基金收益分解

We develop a novel approach to separate alpha and beta under model misspecification. It comes with formal tests to identify less misspecified models and sharpen the return decomposition of individual funds. Our hedge fund analysis reveals that: (i) prominent models are as misspecified as the CAPM, (ii) several factors (time-series momentum, variance, carry) capture alternative strategies and lower performance in all investment categories, (iii) fund heterogeneity in alpha…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A penalized two-pass regression to predict stock returns with time-varying risk premia

时变风险溢价下用于股票收益预测的惩罚两步回归

We develop a penalized two-pass regression with time-varying factor loadings. The penalization in the first pass enforces sparsity for the time-variation drivers while also maintaining compatibility with the no-arbitrage restrictions by regularizing appropriate groups of coefficients. The second pass delivers risk premia estimates to predict equity excess returns. Our Monte Carlo results and our empirical results on a large cross-sectional data set of US individual stocks…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Factors and risk premia in individual international stock returns

国际个股收益中的因子与风险溢价

We propose an estimation methodology tailored for large unbalanced panels of individual stock returns to study the factor structure and expected returns in international stock markets. We show that the local market is necessary to capture the factor structure in both developed and emerging markets. Neither the presence of multiple world or regional risk factors, systematic currency risk factors, nor a country-specific currency subsumes the importance of the local market…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Spanning tests for Markowitz stochastic dominance

Markowitz 随机占优的张成检验

We derive properties of the cdf of random variables defined as saddle-type points of real valued continuous stochastic processes. This facilitates the derivation of the first-order asymptotic properties of tests for stochastic spanning given some stochastic dominance relation. We define the concept of Markowitz stochastic dominance spanning, and develop an analytical representation of the spanning property. We construct a non-parametric test for spanning based on…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Time-Varying Risk Premium in Large Cross-Sectional Equity Data Sets

大型股票横截面数据中的时变风险溢价

We develop an econometric methodology to infer the path of risk premia from a large unbalanced panel of individual stock returns. We estimate the time-varying risk premia implied by conditional linear asset pricing models where the conditioning includes both instruments common to all assets and asset-specific instruments. The estimator uses simple weighted two-pass cross-sectional regressions, and we show its consistency and asymptotic normality under increasing…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Technical trading revisited: False discoveries, persistence tests, and transaction costs

重新审视技术交易:错误发现、持续性检验与交易成本

We revisit the apparent historical success of technical trading rules on daily prices of the Dow Jones Industrial Average index from 1897 to 2011, and we use the false discovery rate (FDR) as a new approach to data snooping. The advantage of the FDR over existing methods is that it selects more outperforming rules, which allows diversifying against model uncertainty. Persistence tests show that, even with the more powerful FDR technique, an investor would never have been…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Testing for Stochastic Dominance Efficiency

随机占优有效性的检验

We consider consistent tests for stochastic dominance efficiency at any order of a given portfolio with respect to all possible portfolios constructed from a set of assets. We justify block bootstrap approaches to achieve valid inference in a time series setting. The test statistics are computed using linear and mixed integer programming formulations. Monte Carlo results show that the bootstrap procedure performs well in finite samples. The empirical application reveals that…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓