跳到正文
收录说明
收录范围
保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础,以及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。书评、刊务及明确无关内容不公开;身份或相关性证据不足的记录保留待核,补充可靠材料后可重新判断。
当前期刊来源见下方官网链接及期刊目录。综合经济学与金融期刊逐篇筛查计量方向,证据不足时暂不公开。正刊、在线优先论文和已核实接收稿合并展示;按标题、可靠摘要、目录及身份匹配的出版社 JEL 分类核验相关性;计量类 JEL 与摘要相互印证,无 JEL 不直接排除。历史回补以可取得的注册题录和目录为准,不等于覆盖全部纸本。
日期与排序
默认按最近发表排序:正刊使用刊期,待刊使用上线日期;缺少上线日期时,排序参考登记或首次收录时间,并在卡片注明。更多筛选可选择出版状态和日期口径;卷期依据出版社元数据,不因待刊时间较长而推定已编入正刊。仅有月份或年份时,日期区间相交也会纳入。

日期精度:到日 5 篇 · 到月 1 篇 · 到年 3 篇

分类与引用
领域和方法依据题名、摘要初步分类,可人工修正;分类不代表论文质量。引用数采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本。
更新与 AI 解读
正常题录、可靠摘要与引用同步继续;日、周、月简报按核实的发表与修订日期汇总,历史补录保留在文献库。AI 解读依据可靠摘要或已核实原文片段,已有解读保留供阅读参考;缺少可靠材料的条目保持待解读,浏览页面不会触发生成。
9 篇论文
导出

On the efficiency of highly stratified experiments

高度分层实验的估计效率

This paper studies the use of highly stratified designs for the efficient estimation of a large class of treatment effect parameters that arise in the analysis of experiments. By a “highly stratified” design, we mean experiments in which units are divided into blocks of a fixed size and a proportion within each block is assigned to a binary treatment uniformly at random. The class of parameters considered are those that can be expressed as the solution to a set of moment…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

The local approach to causal inference under network interference

网络干扰下因果推断的局部方法

We propose a new nonparametric modeling framework for causal inference when outcomes depend on how agents are linked in a social or economic network. Such network interference describes a large literature on treatment spillovers, social interactions, social learning, information diffusion, disease and financial contagion, social capital formation, and more. Our approach works by first characterizing how an agent is linked in the network using the configuration of other…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Inference in Experiments with Matched Pairs and Imperfect Compliance

配对实验中不完全依从下的推断

This article studies inference for the local average treatment effect in randomized controlled trials with imperfect compliance where treatment status is determined according to “matched pairs.” By “matched pairs,” we mean that units are sampled iid from the population of interest, paired according to observed, baseline covariates and finally, within each pair, one unit is selected at random for treatment. Under weak assumptions governing the quality of the pairings, we…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Inference in cluster randomized trials with matched pairs

配对整群随机试验中的统计推断

This paper studies inference in cluster randomized trials where treatment status is determined according to a “matched pairs” design. Here, by a cluster randomized experiment, we mean one in which treatment is assigned at the level of the cluster; by a “matched pairs” design, we mean that a sample of clusters is paired according to baseline, cluster-level covariates and, within each pair, one cluster is selected at random for treatment. We study the large-sample behavior of…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Discussion of ‘Causal inference with misspecified exposure mappings: separating definitions and assumptions’

对《暴露映射误设下的因果推断:区分定义与假设》的讨论:政策评价局限

We thank Sävje (2024) for a thought-provoking article and appreciate the opportunity to share our perspective as social scientists. In his article, Sävje recommended misspecified exposure effects as a way to avoid strong assumptions about interference when analysing the results of an experiment. In this discussion, we highlight a key limitation of Sävje’s recommendation. Exposure effects are not generally useful for evaluating social policies without the strong assumptions…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Inference for matched tuples and fully blocked factorial designs

匹配元组与完全分块析因设计的推断

This paper studies inference in randomized controlled trials with multiple treatments, where treatment status is determined according to a “matched tuples” design. If there are | D | possible treatments, then by a matched tuples design, we mean an experimental design where units are sampled i.i.d. from the population of interest, grouped into “homogeneous” blocks of size | D | , and finally, within each block, exactly one individual is randomly assigned to each of the | D |…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Stratification Trees for Adaptive Randomisation in Randomised Controlled Trials

Abstract This paper proposes an adaptive randomisation procedure for two-stage randomised controlled trials. The method uses data from a first-wave experiment in order to determine how to stratify in a second wave of the experiment, where the objective is to minimise the variance of an estimator for the average treatment effect. We consider selection from a class of stratified randomisation procedures which we call stratification trees: these are procedures whose strata can…

阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Model Selection for Treatment Choice: Penalized Welfare Maximization

处理选择中的模型选择:惩罚化福利最大化

This paper studies a penalized statistical decision rule for the treatment assignment problem. Consider the setting of a utilitarian policy maker who must use sample data to allocate a binary treatment to members of a population, based on their observable characteristics. We model this problem as a statistical decision problem where the policy maker must choose a subset of the covariate space to assign to treatment, out of a class of potential subsets. We focus on settings…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Inference With Dyadic Data: Asymptotic Behavior of the Dyadic-Robust t -Statistic

双边数据推断:双边稳健t统计量的渐近行为

This article is concerned with inference in the linear model with dyadic data. Dyadic data are indexed by pairs of “units;” for example, trade data between pairs of countries. Because of the potential for observations with a unit in common to be correlated, standard inference procedures may not perform as expected. We establish a range of conditions under which a t-statistic with the dyadic-robust variance estimator of Fafchamps and Gubert is asymptotically normal. Using our…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓