论文检索

未观测混杂下因果推断的双重有效与双重锐性敏感性分析AI 解读

We consider the problem of constructing bounds on the average treatment effect (ATE) when unmeasured confounders exist but have bounded influence. Specifically, we assume that omitted confounders could not change the odds of treatment for any unit by more than a fixed factor. We derive the sharp partial identification bounds implied by this assumption by leveraging distributionally robust optimization, and we propose estimators of these bounds with several novel robustness…

通过分位数平衡开展逆倾向加权的锐敏感性分析AI 解读

Inverse propensity weighting (IPW) is a popular method for estimating treatment effects from observational data. However, its correctness relies on the untestable (and frequently implausible) assumption that all confounders have been measured. This paper introduces a robust sensitivity analysis for IPW that estimates the range of treatment effects compatible with a given amount of unobserved confounding. The estimated range converges to the narrowest possible interval (under…

观察性研究中非精确匹配的统计作用AI 解读

Summary In observational causal inference, exact covariate matching plays two statistical roles: (i) it effectively controls for bias due to measured confounding; (ii) it justifies assumption-free inference based on randomization tests. In this paper we show that inexact covariate matching does not always play these same roles. We find that inexact matching often leaves behind statistically meaningful bias, and that this bias renders standard randomization tests…

广义 Oaxaca–Blinder 估计量AI 解读

After performing a randomized experiment, researchers often use ordinary least-square (OLS) regression to adjust for baseline covariates when estimating the average treatment effect. It is widely known that the resulting confidence interval is valid even if the linear model is misspecified. In this article, we generalize that conclusion to covariate adjustment with nonlinear models. We introduce an intuitive way to use any “simple” nonlinear model to construct a…