跳到正文
收录说明
收录范围
保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础,以及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。书评、刊务及明确无关内容不公开;身份或相关性证据不足的记录保留待核,补充可靠材料后可重新判断。
当前期刊来源见下方官网链接及期刊目录。综合经济学与金融期刊逐篇筛查计量方向,证据不足时暂不公开。正刊、在线优先论文和已核实接收稿合并展示;按标题、可靠摘要、目录及身份匹配的出版社 JEL 分类核验相关性;计量类 JEL 与摘要相互印证,无 JEL 不直接排除。历史回补以可取得的注册题录和目录为准,不等于覆盖全部纸本。
日期与排序
默认按最近发表排序:正刊使用刊期,待刊使用上线日期;缺少上线日期时,排序参考登记或首次收录时间,并在卡片注明。更多筛选可选择出版状态和日期口径;卷期依据出版社元数据,不因待刊时间较长而推定已编入正刊。仅有月份或年份时,日期区间相交也会纳入。

日期精度:到日 1 篇 · 到月 3 篇 · 到年 1 篇

分类与引用
领域和方法依据题名、摘要初步分类,可人工修正;分类不代表论文质量。引用数采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本。
更新与 AI 解读
正常题录、可靠摘要与引用同步继续;日、周、月简报按核实的发表与修订日期汇总,历史补录保留在文献库。AI 解读依据可靠摘要或已核实原文片段,已有解读保留供阅读参考;缺少可靠材料的条目保持待解读,浏览页面不会触发生成。
5 篇论文
导出

Graphical Models for Processing Missing Data

用于缺失数据处理的图模型

This article reviews recent advances in missing data research using graphical models to represent multivariate dependencies. We first examine the limitations of traditional frameworks from three different perspectives: transparency, estimability, and testability. We then show how procedures based on graphical models can overcome these limitations and provide meaningful performance guarantees even when data are missing not at random (MNAR). In particular, we identify…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

TRYGVE HAAVELMO AND THE EMERGENCE OF CAUSAL CALCULUS

Haavelmo 与因果演算的形成

Haavelmo was the first to recognize the capacity of economic models to guide policies. This paper describes some of the barriers that Haavelmo’s ideas have had (and still have) to overcome and lays out a logical framework that has evolved from Haavelmo’s insight and matured into a coherent and comprehensive account of the relationships between theory, data, and policy questions. The mathematical tools that emerge from this framework now enable investigators to answer complex…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

COMMENTS ON NEUBERG'S REVIEW OF CAUSALITY

对 Neuberg《因果性》书评的评论

I am grateful to Professor Neuberg for taking the time to study my book Causality and for summarizing its main ideas in a language familiar to readers of Econometric Theory . I will comment on several issues that I believe warrant further discussion. First, I will summarize in my own style what economists can learn from Causality , and, second, I will correct several inaccuracies in the summary of Professor Neuberg.

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Bounds on Treatment Effects from Studies with Imperfect Compliance

不完全依从研究中的处理效应界

This article establishes nonparametric formulas that can be used to bound the average treatment effect in experimental studies in which treatment assignment is random but subject compliance is imperfect. The bounds provided are the tightest possible, given the distribution of assignments, treatments, and responses. The formulas show that even with high rates of noncompliance, experimental data can yield useful and sometimes accurate information on the average effect of a…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Causal diagrams for empirical research

实证研究中的因果图

The primary aim of this paper is to show how graphical models can be used as a mathematical language for integrating statistical and subject-matter information. In particular, the paper develops a principled, nonparametric framework for causal inference, in which diagrams are queried to determine if the assumptions available are sufficient for identifying causal effects from nonexperimental data. If so the diagrams can be queried to produce mathematical expressions for…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓