论文检索

部分识别下的稳健贝叶斯处理选择AI 解读

We study a class of binary treatment choice problems with partial identification through the lens of robust (multiple prior) Bayesian analysis. We use a convenient set of prior distributions to derive ex-ante and ex-post robust Bayes decision rules, both for decision makers who can randomize and for decision makers who cannot. Our main messages are as follows: First, ex-ante and ex-post robust Bayes decision rules do not agree in general, whether or not randomized rules are…

部分识别下处理选择问题的决策理论AI 解读

Abstract We apply classical statistical decision theory to a large class of treatment choice problems with partial identification. We show that, in a general class of problems with Gaussian likelihood, all decision rules are admissible; it is maximin-welfare optimal to ignore all data; and, for severe enough partial identification, there are infinitely many minimax-regret optimal decision rules, all of which sometimes randomize the policy recommendation. We uniquely…

检验两个参数的符号一致性AI 解读

ABSTRACT We test the null hypothesis that two parameters have the same sign, assuming that (asymptotically) normal estimators are available. Examples of this problem include the analysis of heterogeneous treatment effects, causal interpretation of reduced‐form estimands, meta‐studies, and mediation analysis. A number of tests were recently proposed. We recommend a test that is simple and rejects more often than many of these recent proposals. Like all other tests in the…

部分识别参数投影的置信区间AI 解读

We propose a bootstrap‐based calibrated projection procedure to build confidence intervals for single components and for smooth functions of a partially identified parameter vector in moment (in)equality models. The method controls asymptotic coverage uniformly over a large class of data generating processes. The extreme points of the calibrated projection confidence interval are obtained by extremizing the value of the function of interest subject to a proper relaxation of…

随机效用模型的非参数分析AI 解读

This paper develops and implements a nonparametric test of random utility models. The motivating application is to test the null hypothesis that a sample of cross‐sectional demand distributions was generated by a population of rational consumers. We test a necessary and sufficient condition for this that does not restrict unobserved heterogeneity or the number of goods. We also propose and implement a control function approach to account for endogenous expenditure. An…

含协变量或实验有效性受限时的最小最大遗憾处理选择AI 解读

This paper continues the investigation of minimax regret treatment choice initiated by Manski (2004). Consider a decision maker who must assign treatment to future subjects after observing outcomes experienced in a sample. A certain scoring rule is known to achieve minimax regret in simple versions of this decision problem. I investigate its sensitivity to perturbations of the decision environment in realistic directions. They are as follows. (i) Treatment outcomes may be…

分布离散程度参数的部分识别AI 解读

This paper analyzes partial identification of parameters that measure a distribution's spread, for example, the variance, Gini coefficient, entropy, or interquartile range. The core results are tight, two-dimensional identification regions for the expectation and variance, the median and interquartile ratio, and many other combinations of parameters. They are developed for numerous identification settings, including but not limited to cases where one can bound either the…

有限样本下的最小最大遗憾处理选择AI 解读

This paper applies the minimax regret criterion to choice between two treatments conditional on observation of a finite sample. The analysis is based on exact small sample regret and does not use asymptotic approximations or finite-sample bounds. Core results are: (i) Minimax regret treatment rules are well approximated by empirical success rules in many cases, but differ from them significantly-both in terms of how the rules look and in terms of maximal regret incurred-for…

不完整数据与多种处理下的最小最大遗憾决策AI 解读

This note adds to the recent research project on treatment choice under ambiguity. I generalize the Manski (Journal of Econometrics, in press) analysis of minimax regret treatment choice by considering a more general setting and, more importantly, by solving for the treatment rule given finitely many (as opposed to two) treatments. The most interesting finding is that with three or more undominated treatments, the minimax regret treatment rule may assign the same treatment…