跳到正文
收录说明
收录范围
保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础,以及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。书评、刊务及明确无关内容不公开;身份或相关性证据不足的记录保留待核,补充可靠材料后可重新判断。
当前期刊来源见下方官网链接及期刊目录。综合经济学与金融期刊逐篇筛查计量方向,证据不足时暂不公开。正刊、在线优先论文和已核实接收稿合并展示;按标题、可靠摘要、目录及身份匹配的出版社 JEL 分类核验相关性;计量类 JEL 与摘要相互印证,无 JEL 不直接排除。历史回补以可取得的注册题录和目录为准,不等于覆盖全部纸本。
日期与排序
默认按最近发表排序:正刊使用刊期,待刊使用上线日期;缺少上线日期时,排序参考登记或首次收录时间,并在卡片注明。更多筛选可选择出版状态和日期口径;卷期依据出版社元数据,不因待刊时间较长而推定已编入正刊。仅有月份或年份时,日期区间相交也会纳入。

日期精度:到日 4 篇 · 到月 0 篇 · 到年 0 篇

分类与引用
领域和方法依据题名、摘要初步分类,可人工修正;分类不代表论文质量。引用数采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本。
更新与 AI 解读
正常题录、可靠摘要与引用同步继续;日、周、月简报按核实的发表与修订日期汇总,历史补录保留在文献库。AI 解读依据可靠摘要或已核实原文片段,已有解读保留供阅读参考;缺少可靠材料的条目保持待解读,浏览页面不会触发生成。
4 篇论文
导出

Christian Hennig’s contribution to the Discussion of ‘Safe testing’ by Grünwald, de Heide, and Koolen

Christian Hennig对《安全检验》的讨论

I appreciate the elegance of the theory regarding (RE)GRO(W) e-variables with optional continuation for combining evidence. Here are some rather problematic aspects. (1) The authors state that ‘there seems to be growing consensus that, in the context of hypothesis testing, p-values should either not be used at all, or at least, with utter care’. I see little consensus that p-values should not be used at all. The request for ‘utter care’ is sensible, but I do not believe that…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Christian Hennig's contribution to the Discussion of ‘Assumption-Lean Inference for Generalised Linear Model Parameters’ by Vansteelandt and Dukes

Hennig 对《广义线性模型参数的弱假设推断》的讨论

There is a tendency in statistics to talk about model assumptions in a misleading way. Most of us probably agree with George Box's ‘all models are wrong but some are useful’, yet there is much communication that implies that for applying methods ‘assuming’ certain models, these models have to be true. If this were so, no model-based method could ever be used! Generally model assumptions do not have to be fulfilled. A model assumption just means that certain theoretical…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Robust Improper Maximum Likelihood: Tuning, Computation, and a Comparison With Other Methods for Robust Gaussian Clustering

稳健非正规极大似然:调优、计算及与其他稳健高斯聚类方法的比较

The two main topics of this article are the introduction of the “optimally tuned robust improper maximum likelihood estimator” (OTRIMLE) for robust clustering based on the multivariate Gaussian model for clusters, and a comprehensive simulation study comparing the OTRIMLE to maximum likelihood in Gaussian mixtures with and without noise component, mixtures of t-distributions, and the TCLUST approach for trimmed clustering. The OTRIMLE uses an improper constant density for…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Breakdown points for maximum likelihood estimators of location–scale mixtures

位置—尺度混合模型极大似然估计的崩溃点

ML-estimation based on mixtures of Normal distributions is a widely used tool for cluster analysis. However, a single outlier can make the parameter estimation of at least one of the mixture components break down. Among others, the estimation of mixtures of t-distributions by McLachlan and Peel [Finite Mixture Models (2000) Wiley, New York] and the addition of a further mixture component accounting for “noise” by Fraley and Raftery [The Computer J. 41 (1998) 578–588] were…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓