跳到正文
收录说明
收录范围
保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础,以及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。书评、刊务及明确无关内容不公开;身份或相关性证据不足的记录保留待核,补充可靠材料后可重新判断。
当前期刊来源见下方官网链接及期刊目录。综合经济学与金融期刊逐篇筛查计量方向,证据不足时暂不公开。正刊、在线优先论文和已核实接收稿合并展示;按标题、可靠摘要、目录及身份匹配的出版社 JEL 分类核验相关性;计量类 JEL 与摘要相互印证,无 JEL 不直接排除。历史回补以可取得的注册题录和目录为准,不等于覆盖全部纸本。
日期与排序
默认按最近发表排序:正刊使用刊期,待刊使用上线日期;缺少上线日期时,排序参考登记或首次收录时间,并在卡片注明。更多筛选可选择出版状态和日期口径;卷期依据出版社元数据,不因待刊时间较长而推定已编入正刊。仅有月份或年份时,日期区间相交也会纳入。

日期精度:到日 4 篇 · 到月 0 篇 · 到年 0 篇

分类与引用
领域和方法依据题名、摘要初步分类,可人工修正;分类不代表论文质量。引用数采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本。
更新与 AI 解读
正常题录、可靠摘要与引用同步继续;日、周、月简报按核实的发表与修订日期汇总,历史补录保留在文献库。AI 解读依据可靠摘要或已核实原文片段,已有解读保留供阅读参考;缺少可靠材料的条目保持待解读,浏览页面不会触发生成。
4 篇论文
导出

Doubly Robust Pointwise Confidence Intervals for a Monotonic Continuous Treatment Effect Curve

单调连续处理效应曲线的双重稳健逐点置信区间

We study nonparametric inference for the causal dose–response curve when the treatment variable is continuous rather than discrete. We develop doubly robust confidence intervals for the continuous treatment effect curve (at a fixed point) under the assumption that it is monotonic, based on inverting a likelihood ratio-type test. Monotonicity of the treatment effect curve is often a very natural assumption, and this assumption removes the need to choose a smoothing or tuning…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A nonparametric doubly robust test for a continuous treatment effect

连续处理效应的非参数双重稳健检验

The vast majority of literature on evaluating the significance of a treatment effect based on observational data has been confined to discrete treatments. These methods are not applicable to drawing inference for a continuous treatment, which arises in many important applications. To adjust for confounders when evaluating a continuous treatment, existing inference methods often rely on discretizing the treatment or using (possibly misspecified) parametric models for the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Inference for the mode of a log-concave density

对数凹密度众数的统计推断

We study a likelihood ratio test for the location of the mode of a log-concave density. Our test is based on comparison of the log-likelihoods corresponding to the unconstrained maximum likelihood estimator of a log-concave density and the constrained maximum likelihood estimator where the constraint is that the mode of the density is fixed, say at $m$. The constrained estimation problem is studied in detail in Doss and Wellner (2018). Here, the results of that paper are…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Global rates of convergence of the MLEs of log-concave and $s$-concave densities

对数凹与 s 凹密度极大似然估计的全局收敛速率

We establish global rates of convergence for the Maximum Likelihood Estimators (MLEs) of log-concave and $s$-concave densities on $\mathbb{R}$. The main finding is that the rate of convergence of the MLE in the Hellinger metric is no worse than $n^{-2/5}$ when $-1<s<\infty$ where $s=0$ corresponds to the log-concave case. We also show that the MLE does not exist for the classes of $s$-concave densities with $s<-1$.

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓