跳到正文
收录说明
收录范围
保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础,以及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。书评、刊务及明确无关内容不公开;身份或相关性证据不足的记录保留待核,补充可靠材料后可重新判断。
当前期刊来源见下方官网链接及期刊目录。综合经济学与金融期刊逐篇筛查计量方向,证据不足时暂不公开。正刊、在线优先论文和已核实接收稿合并展示;按标题、可靠摘要、目录及身份匹配的出版社 JEL 分类核验相关性;计量类 JEL 与摘要相互印证,无 JEL 不直接排除。历史回补以可取得的注册题录和目录为准,不等于覆盖全部纸本。
日期与排序
默认按最近发表排序:正刊使用刊期,待刊使用上线日期;缺少上线日期时,排序参考登记或首次收录时间,并在卡片注明。更多筛选可选择出版状态和日期口径;卷期依据出版社元数据,不因待刊时间较长而推定已编入正刊。仅有月份或年份时,日期区间相交也会纳入。

日期精度:到日 0 篇 · 到月 10 篇 · 到年 0 篇

分类与引用
领域和方法依据题名、摘要初步分类,可人工修正;分类不代表论文质量。引用数采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本。
更新与 AI 解读
正常题录、可靠摘要与引用同步继续;日、周、月简报按核实的发表与修订日期汇总,历史补录保留在文献库。AI 解读依据可靠摘要或已核实原文片段,已有解读保留供阅读参考;缺少可靠材料的条目保持待解读,浏览页面不会触发生成。
10 篇论文
导出

Evaluating asset‐pricing models using the Hansen–Jagannathan bound: a Monte Carlo investigation

利用 Hansen–Jagannathan 界评价资产定价模型:蒙特卡洛研究

Abstract We use recent statistical tests, based on a ‘distance’ between the model and the Hansen–Jagannathan bound, to compute the rejection rates of true models. For asset‐pricing models with time‐separable preferences, the finite‐sample distribution of the test statistic associated with the risk‐neutral case is extreme, in the sense that critical values based on this distribution deliver type I errors no larger than intended—regardless of risk aversion or the rate of time…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Keynesian impulses versus Solow residuals: identifying sources of business cycle fluctuations

凯恩斯式冲击与索洛残差:识别经济周期波动来源

We employ a neoclassical business-cycle model to study two sources of business-cycle fluctuations: marginal efficiency of investment shocks, and total factor productivity shocks. The parameters of the model are estimated using a Bayesian procedure that accommodates prior uncertainty about their magnitudes; from these estimates, posterior distributions of the two shocks are obtained. The postwar US experience suggests that both shocks are important in understanding…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Modeling Stock Prices without Knowing How to Induce Stationarity

无需预先确定平稳化方式的股票价格建模:计算更正

In “Modeling Stock Prices without Knowing How to Induce Stationarity” (1994, Econometric Theory 10, 701–719), we used posterior-odds calculations to evaluate restrictions imposed by a present-value model of stock prices across the equations of a VAR representation of stock prices and dividends. The results we reported are tainted by the omission of two factors: the Jacobians induced by the mapping of our priors over VAR parameters β into the restricted sample spaces relevant…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

A Bayesian Approach to Calibration

校准的贝叶斯方法

The authors develop a Bayesian approach to calibration which enables the incorporation of uncertainty regarding the parameters of the theoretical model under investigation. Their procedure involves the specification of prior distributions over parameter values, which in turn induce distributions over the statistical properties of artificial data simulated from the model. These distributions are compared with their empirical counterparts in order to assess the model's fit.…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Modeling Stock Prices without Knowing How to Induce Stationarity

在未知平稳化方式下建模股票价格

Bayesian procedures for evaluating linear restrictions imposed by economic theory on dynamic econometric models are applied to a simple class of presentvalue models of stock prices. The procedures generate inferences that are not conditional on ancillary assumptions regarding the nature of the nonstationarity that characterizes the data. Inferences are influenced by prior views concerning nonstationarity, but these views are formally incorporated into the analysis, and…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Estimating Moving Average Parameters: Classical Pileups and Bayesian Posteriors

移动平均参数估计:经典估计的堆积现象与贝叶斯后验

The authors analyze posterior distributions of the moving average parameter in the first-order case and sampling distributions of the corresponding maximum likelihood estimator. Sampling distributions 'pile up' at unity when the true parameter is near unity; hence, if one were to difference such a process, estimates of the moving average component of the resulting series would spuriously tend to indicate that the process was overdifferenced. Flat-prior posterior…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

The case for trend‐stationarity is stronger than we thought

支持趋势平稳的证据比我们原先认为的更强

Abstract In DeJong and Whiteman (1991a), we concluded that 11 of the 14 macroeconomic time‐series originally studied by Nelson and Plosser (1982) supported trend‐stationarity. Phillips (1991) criticizes this inference, claiming that our procedure is biased against integration, and that our results are sensitive to model and prior specification. However, Phillips' alternative models and priors bias his results in favour of integration; despite these biases, Phillips' own…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓