跳到正文
收录说明
收录范围
保留计量方法研究、相关统计基础,以及实质涉及计量方法的应用、教程、比较和综述。书评、刊务及明确无关内容不公开;身份或相关性证据不足的记录保留待核,补充可靠材料后可重新判断。
当前期刊来源见下方官网链接及期刊目录。综合经济学与金融期刊逐篇筛查计量方向,证据不足时暂不公开。正刊、在线优先论文和已核实接收稿合并展示;按标题、可靠摘要、目录及身份匹配的出版社 JEL 分类核验相关性;计量类 JEL 与摘要相互印证,无 JEL 不直接排除。历史回补以可取得的注册题录和目录为准,不等于覆盖全部纸本。
日期与排序
默认按最近发表排序:正刊使用刊期,待刊使用上线日期;缺少上线日期时,排序参考登记或首次收录时间,并在卡片注明。更多筛选可选择出版状态和日期口径;卷期依据出版社元数据,不因待刊时间较长而推定已编入正刊。仅有月份或年份时,日期区间相交也会纳入。

日期精度:到日 1 篇 · 到月 8 篇 · 到年 0 篇

分类与引用
领域和方法依据题名、摘要初步分类,可人工修正;分类不代表论文质量。引用数采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计版本。
更新与 AI 解读
正常题录、可靠摘要与引用同步继续;日、周、月简报按核实的发表与修订日期汇总,历史补录保留在文献库。AI 解读依据可靠摘要或已核实原文片段,已有解读保留供阅读参考;缺少可靠材料的条目保持待解读,浏览页面不会触发生成。
9 篇论文
导出

Bootstrapping factor models with cross sectional dependence

存在横截面依赖的因子模型自助法

We consider bootstrap methods for factor-augmented regressions with cross sectional dependence among idiosyncratic errors. This is important to capture the bias of the OLS estimator derived recently by Gonçalves and Perron (2014). We first show that a common approach of resampling cross sectional vectors over time is invalid in this context because it induces a zero bias. We then propose the cross-sectional dependent (CSD) bootstrap where bootstrap samples are obtained by…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Tests of equal accuracy for nested models with estimated factors

含估计因子的嵌套模型等预测精度检验

In this paper we develop asymptotics for tests of equal predictive ability between nested models when factor-augmented regressions are used to forecast. We provide conditions under which the estimation of the factors does not affect the asymptotic distributions developed in Clark and McCracken (2001) and McCracken (2007). This enables researchers to use the existing tabulated critical values when conducting inference despite the presence of estimated predictors. As an…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Bootstrap Prediction Intervals for Factor Models

因子模型的Bootstrap预测区间

We propose bootstrap prediction intervals for an observation h periods into the future and its conditional mean. We assume that these forecasts are made using a set of factors extracted from a large panel of variables. Because we treat these factors as latent, our forecasts depend both on estimated factors and estimated regression coefficients. Under regularity conditions, asymptotic intervals have been shown to be valid under Gaussianity of the innovations. The bootstrap…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Point-optimal panel unit root tests with serially correlated errors

误差序列相关下的点最优面板单位根检验

Generalizations of the point‐optimal panel unit root tests of Moon, Perron and Phillips (MPP) are developed to cover cases of serially correlated errors. The resulting statistics involve two modifications relative to those of MPP: (a) the error variance is replaced by the long‐run variance; (b) centring of the statistic is adjusted to correct for second‐order bias effects induced by the correlation between the error and lagged dependent variable.

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Bootstrapping factor-augmented regression models

因子增强回归模型的自助法

This paper proposes and theoretically justifies bootstrap methods for regressions where some of the regressors are factors estimated from a large panel of data. We derive our results under the assumption that T/N→c, where 0≤c<∞ (N and T are the cross-sectional and the time series dimensions, respectively), thus allowing for the possibility that the factor estimation error enters the limiting distribution of the OLS estimator as an asymptotic bias term (as was recently…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

PETER C.B. PHILLIPS’S CONTRIBUTIONS TO PANEL DATA METHODS

Peter C. B. Phillips 对面板数据方法的贡献

This paper discusses Peter Phillips’s contributions to panel data methods. These include contributions in the areas of seemingly unrelated regressions, nonstationary panel data, dynamic panels, and the development of multiple index asymptotic theory. We also discuss his empirical contributions in the area of economic growth and convergence that use macro panel data.

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓

Asymptotic local power of pooled t-ratio tests for unit roots in panels with fixed effects

含固定效应面板中混合 t 比率单位根检验的渐近局部功效

. This latter test is equivalent to the well-known pooled t test proposed by Levin et al. (2002, Journal of Econometrics 108, 1--24), and its power depends only on the mean of the local-to-unity parameters. This implies that it has the same power against homogeneous and heterogeneous alternatives with the same mean autoregressive parameter. We then compare these tests to a panel version of the Sargan-Bhargava (1983, Econometrica 51, 153--74) statistic for a unit root and the…

AI 解读阅读原文 ↗BibTeX ↓